Original paper| Volume 33, ISSUE 4, P575-580, April 1997

Download started.


Why are cancer patients using non-proven complementary therapies? A cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      This study addressed the use of alternative medicine, here called non-proven therapies (NPTs), among hospitalised Norwegian cancer patients. A total of 126 (20%) of the assessable 630 patients were users of NPTs. Approximately 43% of all patients and more than 60% of the users of NPTs stated that they would like NPTs to be an option in hospitals belonging to the National Health Service. Most users of NPTs (82%) consulted traditional medicine first, while 15% started treatment with NPTs simultaneously. Users of NPTs reported to have received less hope of a cure (30%) from their physicians than non-users (50%). Users mostly learned about NPTs from friends and relatives. Most users believed that NPTs might give them strength and relieve their symptoms. Very few patients believed in a cure (10%). Nearly 40% were uncertain of any effect of the NPTs or felt there had been no effect. 4 patients reported adverse effects. 15 patients had been treated abroad, most of them in Denmark. Expenses incurred through use of NPTs were mostly moderate, but some patients used large sums of money. Patients' opinions on whether or not the treatment had been expensive were closely linked to their anticipation of the effect of the treatment.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ganes E
        En undersøkelse om kreftpasienters medisinske og sosiale situasjon.
        in: Release 6.03 Edition. Thesis. Institutt For Allmennmedisin Universitetet i Oslo, 1978
        • Gjemdal T
        The use of alternative medicine among patients.
        J Norweg Med Assoc. 1979; 99: 883-886
        • Arkko P
        A survey of unproven cancer remedies and their users in an outpatient clinic for cancer therapy in Finland.
        Soc Sci Med. 1980; 14A: 511-514
        • Damkier A
        • Jensen BA
        • Rose C
        Cancer patients' use of Q10.
        Ugeskr Loeger. 1994; 156: 813-818
        • Berger RDP
        Tumour patients and alternative medicine: an attempt at characterising users of alternative methods in oncology.
        Dtsch med Wschr. 1989; 114: 323-330
        • Morant R
        • Jungi WF
        • Koehli C
        • Senn HJ
        Why do cancer patients use alternative medicine?.
        Schweiz med Wschr. 1991; 121: 1029-1034
        • Zouwe N
        • Dam FSAM
        • Aaronsen NK
        • Hanewald GJFP
        Alternative therapies in cancer: prevalence and backgrounds.
        Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994; 138: 300-306
        • Downer SM
        • Cody MM
        • Cluskey PMN
        Pursuit and practice of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment.
        Br Med J. 1994; 309: 86-89
        • U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment
        Unconventional Cancer Treatment.
        in: Release 6.03 Edition. OTA-H-405. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC1990
        • Harris L
        • et al.
        Health information and the use of questionable treatments: a study of the American public.
        Study number 833015. 1987; (Conducted for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)
        • Cassileth BR
        Contemporary unorthodox treatments in cancer medicine.
        Ann Intern Med. 1984; 101: 105-112
        • Risberg T
        • Lund E
        • Wist E
        • et al.
        The use of non-proven therapy among patients treated in Norwegian oncological departments. A cross sectional national multi-centre study.
        Eur J Cancer. 1995; 31A: 1785-1789
        • Risberg T
        • Wist E
        • Kaasa S
        • et al.
        Spiritual healing among Norwegian hospitalised cancer patients and patients' religious needs and preferences of pastoral services.
        Eur J Cancer. 1996; 32A: 274-281
        • Risberg T
        Årsaker til kreftsykdom og bruk av alternativ medisin.
        Folkehelseoppgave Institutt for Samfunnsmedisin, 1991 (UiTø)
        • Skarshaug A
        Use of alternative medicine among cancer patients in the northern part of Norway.
        Student Thesis. 1994; (in Norwegian)
        • SAS Institute Inc.
        Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Procedures Guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina1988
        • Breslow NE
        • Day NE
        Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. The Analysis of Case-control Studies.
        in: IARC Scientific Publications No. 32. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon1980
        • Efskind L
        • Johansen AT
        Folk-medicine and supernatural cures.
        J Norweg Med Assoc. 1976; 97: 1582-1586
        • Eidinger RN
        Cancer patients insight into their treatment, prognosis and unconventional therapies.
        Cancer. 1984; 53: 2736-2740
        • Bruseth S
        Kreft og jakten på mirakler.
        Gyldendals Norsk Forlag A/S, 1993
        • Risberg T
        • Lund E
        • Wist E
        Use of non-proven therapies. Differences in attitude between pateints with non-malignant disease and patients suffering from cancer.
        Acta Oncol. 1995; 34: 893-898
        • Bostrem H
        Biverkningspanorama vid Altemativmedicinsk verksamhet SLS Handlingar. 1989; Band 98 (Hefte 1)
        • La Mar S
        Alternative therapies.
        Cancer. 1990; 67: 1788-1792