Advertisement
Original Research| Volume 185, P61-68, May 2023

A federated approach to identify women with early-stage cervical cancer at low risk of lymph node metastases

Published:February 25, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.021

      Highlights

      • Federated learning was applied to analyse data while preserving privacy.
      • LVSI, tumour size, and depth of invasion were the most important risk factors of pN+.
      • 41% of the women with early-stage cervical cancer were at low risk (2.4%) of pN+.

      Abstract

      Objective

      Lymph node metastases (pN+) in presumed early-stage cervical cancer negatively impact prognosis. Using federated learning, we aimed to develop a tool to identify a group of women at low risk of pN+, to guide the shared decision-making process concerning the extent of lymph node dissection.

      Methods

      Women with cervical cancer between 2005 and 2020 were identified retrospectively from population-based registries: the Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database, Swedish Quality Registry for Gynaecologic Cancer and Netherlands Cancer Registry. Inclusion criteria were: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma; The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 IA2, IB1 and IIA1; treatment with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node assessment. We applied privacy-preserving federated logistic regression to identify risk factors of pN+. Significant factors were used to stratify the risk of pN+.

      Results

      We included 3606 women (pN+ 11%). The most important risk factors of pN+ were lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.59–5.79), tumour size 21–40 mm (OR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.89–2.43) and depth of invasion>10 mm (OR 1.81, 95% CI, 1.59–2.08). A group of 1469 women (41%)—with tumours without LVSI, tumour size ≤20 mm, and depth of invasion ≤10 mm—had a very low risk of pN+ (2.4%, 95% CI, 1.7–3.3%).

      Conclusion

      Early-stage cervical cancer without LVSI, a tumour size ≤20 mm and depth of invasion ≤10 mm, confers a low risk of pN+. Based on an international privacy-preserving analysis, we developed a useful tool to guide the shared decision-making process regarding lymph node dissection.

      Graphical Abstract

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Olthof E.P.
        • van der Aa M.A.
        • Adam J.A.
        • et al.
        The role of lymph nodes in cervical cancer: incidence and identification of lymph node metastases-a literature review.
        Int J Clin Oncol. 2021; 26: 1600-1610https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01980-2
        • Cibula D.
        • Pötter R.
        • Planchamp F.
        • et al.
        The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer.
        Virchows Arch. 2018; 472: 919-936https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2362-9
      1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cervical cancer (NCCN guideline version 1.2023). 2023; Available from 〈https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf〉.

        • Cibula D.
        • Borčinová M.
        • Marnitz S.
        • et al.
        Lower-limb lymphedema after sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer patients.
        Cancers. 2021; 132360https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102360
        • Sponholtz S.E.
        • Ezendam N.P.M.
        • de Rooij B.H.
        • et al.
        SENTIREC - the sentinel node mapping in women with cervical cancer study - patient-reported early lymphedema and its impact on quality of life.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2022; 164: 463-472https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.024
        • Cibula D.
        • Abu-Rustum N.R.
        • Dusek L.
        • et al.
        Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 127: 462-466https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.035
        • Ten Eikelder M.L.G.
        • Hinten F.
        • Smits A.
        • et al.
        Does the new FIGO 2018 staging system allow better prognostic differentiation in early stage cervical cancer? A Dutch nationwide cohort study.
        Cancers. 2022; 143140https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133140
        • Dai W.
        • Wang S.
        • Xiong H.
        • et al.
        Privacy preserving federated big data analysis.
        Guide to Big Data Applications. Springer, 2018: 49-82
        • Li Q.
        • Wen Z.
        • Wu Z.
        • et al.
        A survey on federated learning systems: vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection.
        IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2021; 35: 3347-3366https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2021.3124599
        • Deist T.M.
        • Dankers F.
        • Ojha P.
        • et al.
        Distributed learning on 20,000+ lung cancer patients - the personal health train.
        Radiother Oncol. 2020; 144: 189-200https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.11.019
        • Geleijnse G.
        • Chiang R.C.
        • Sieswerda M.
        • et al.
        Prognostic factors analysis for oral cavity cancer survival in the Netherlands and Taiwan using a privacy-preserving federated infrastructure.
        Sci Rep. 2020; 1020526https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77476-2
        • Sørensen S.M.
        • Bjørn S.F.
        • Jochumsen K.M.
        • et al.
        Danish gynecological cancer database.
        Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 8: 485-490https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.S99479
        • Rosenberg P.
        • Kjølhede P.
        • Staf C.
        • et al.
        Data quality in the Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer - a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (SweGCG) study.
        Acta Oncol. 2018; 57: 346-353https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2017.1366048
        • van der Sanden G.A.
        • Coebergh J.W.
        • Schouten L.J.
        • et al.
        Cancer incidence in the Netherlands in 1989 and 1990: first results of the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Coordinating committee for regional cancer registries.
        Eur J Cancer. 1995; 31a: 1822-1829https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8049(95)00355-m
        • Smits D.
        • Van Beusekom B.
        • Martin F.
        • et al.
        An improved infrastructure for privacy-preserving analysis of patient data.
        Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022; 295: 144-147https://doi.org/10.3233/shti220682
        • Cellamare M.
        • van Gestel A.J.
        • Alradhi H.
        • et al.
        A federated generalized linear model for privacy-preserving analysis.
        Algorithms. 2022; 15243
        • Agresti A.
        • Coull B.A.
        Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions.
        Am Stat. 1998; 52: 119-126https://doi.org/10.2307/2685469
        • Rob L.
        • Robova H.
        • Halaska M.J.
        • et al.
        Current status of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of cervical cancer.
        Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013; 13: 861-870https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.2013.811147
        • Mathevet P.
        • Lécuru F.
        • Uzan C.
        • et al.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy and morbidity outcomes in early cervical cancer: results of a multicentre randomised trial (SENTICOL-2).
        Eur J Cancer. 2021; 148: 307-315https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.009
        • Sponholtz S.E.
        • Mogensen O.
        • Hildebrandt M.G.
        • et al.
        From FIGO-2009 to FIGO-2018 in women with early-stage cervical cancer; does the revised staging reflect risk groups.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2021; 163: 281-288https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.026
        • Balaya V.
        • Guani B.
        • Mereaux J.
        • et al.
        Can conization specimens predict sentinel lymph node status in early-stage cervical cancer? A SENTICOL group study.
        Cancers. 2021; 135423https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13215423
        • Bidus M.A.
        • Caffrey A.S.
        • You W.B.
        • et al.
        Cervical biopsy and excision procedure specimens lack sufficient predictive value for lymph-vascular space invasion seen at hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199151.e1-4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.02.017
        • Bai H.
        • Cao D.
        • Yuan F.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of conization procedure for predicting pathological parameters of radical hysterectomy in stage Ia2-Ib1 (≤2 cm) cervical cancer.
        Sci Rep. 2016; 625992https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25992
        • Andikyan V.
        • Griffith M.
        • Tymon-Rosario J.
        • et al.
        Variability in the identification of lymphovascular space invasion for early stage cervical cancer.
        Surg Oncol. 2021; 38101566https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101566
        • Bosse T.
        • Peters E.E.
        • Creutzberg C.L.
        • et al.
        Substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) is a significant risk factor for recurrence in endometrial cancer--a pooled analysis of PORTEC 1 and 2 trials.
        Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51: 1742-1750https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.015
        • Peters E.E.M.
        • Bartosch C.
        • McCluggage W.G.
        • et al.
        Reproducibility of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) assessment in endometrial cancer.
        Histopathology. 2019; 75: 128-136https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13871
        • Huang G.
        • Cui Y.
        • Wang P.
        • et al.
        Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics analysis of cervical cancer for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular space invasion.
        Front Oncol. 2021; 11663370https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.663370
        • Li Z.
        • Li H.
        • Wang S.
        • et al.
        MR-based radiomics nomogram of cervical cancer in prediction of the lymph-vascular space invasion preoperatively.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 49: 1420-1426https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26531
        • Vetter M.H.
        • Smrz S.
        • Gehrig P.A.
        • et al.
        Pathologic and clinical tumor size discordance in early-stage cervical cancer: does it matter.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 159: 354-358https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.004
        • Mitchell D.G.
        • Snyder B.
        • Coakley F.
        • et al.
        Early invasive cervical cancer: Tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 5687-5694https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.07.4799
        • Ozsarlak O.
        • Tjalma W.
        • Schepens E.
        • et al.
        The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
        Eur Radiol. 2003; 13: 2338-2345https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1928-2
        • Salvo G.
        • Odetto D.
        • Saez Perrotta M.C.
        • et al.
        Measurement of tumor size in early cervical cancer: an ever-evolving paradigm.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020; 30: 1215-1223https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001436
        • Parra-Herran C.
        • Taljaard M.
        • Djordjevic B.
        • et al.
        Pattern-based classification of invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma, depth of invasion measurement and distinction from adenocarcinoma in situ: interobserver variation among gynecologic pathologists.
        Mod Pathol. 2016; 29: 879-892https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2016.86
        • Fujiwara K.
        • Yoden E.
        • Asakawa T.
        • et al.
        Negative MRI findings with invasive cervical biopsy may indicate stage ia cervical carcinoma.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 79: 451-456https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.5967
        • Lakhman Y.
        • Akin O.
        • Park K.J.
        • et al.
        Stage IB1 cervical cancer: role of preoperative MR imaging in selection of patients for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy.
        Radiology. 2013; 269: 149-158https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121746
        • Bizzarri N.
        • Pedone Anchora L.
        • Kucukmetin A.
        • et al.
        Protective role of conization before radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a propensity-score matching study.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28: 3585-3594https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09695-4
        • Chacon E.
        • Manzour N.
        • Zanagnolo V.
        • et al.
        SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022; 32: 117-124https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-002544