The publisher regrets that errors appear in Table 2a in the printed article. These errors have now been corrected online, and the correct version of Table 2a is given here.
We also note that a Multimedia component was included with the online article in error. This has now been removed from the online article. We can confirm that there are no additional Supplementary Data files to appear with this article.
The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Article info
Publication history
Published online: November 05, 2022
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
User license
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) | How you can reuse 
Elsevier's open access license policy
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0)
Permitted
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Linking EORTC QLQ-C-30 and PedsQL/PEDQOL physical functioning scores in patients with osteosarcomaEuropean Journal of CancerVol. 170
- PreviewThe available questionnaires for quality-of-life (QoL) assessments are age-group specific, limiting comparability and impeding longitudinal analyses. The comparability of measurements, however, is a necessary condition for gaining scientific evidence. To overcome this problem, we assessed the viability of harmonising data from paediatric and adult patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.
- Full-Text
- Preview
00404-X&id=fx1.jpg){kind=link}