Advertisement
Clinical Trial| Volume 148, P382-394, May 2021

Pembrolizumab plus eribulin in hormone-receptor–positive, HER2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (KELLY): An open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase Ⅱ trial

Published:March 29, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.028

      Highlights

      • Pembrolizumab + eribulin showed clinical benefit in luminal metastatic breast cancer (BC).
      • Objective responses were achieved regardless of programmed death ligand 1 status.
      • Its safety profile is similar to eribulin or pembrolizumab monotherapy.
      • New predictive biomarkers are required in endocrine-resistant BC.

      Abstract

      Background

      Pembrolizumab has modest activity if used in patients with hormone-receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative, previously treated metastatic breast cancer (BC). Our study investigated whether there would be any clinical benefit in combining chemotherapy with pembrolizumab in a similar patient population.

      Methods

      This single-arm, phase Ⅱ trial enrolled women aged ≥18 years with HR+, HER2-negative, inoperable, locally recurrent or metastatic BC. Patients were previously treated with hormonal therapy and 1–2 chemotherapy regimens for locally recurrent and/or metastatic BC. On each 21-day cycle, patients received intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 and eribulin 1∙23 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate. Analysis of safety and activity was carried out in all patients who met the screening criteria and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03222856.

      Results

      Of the 44 patients enrolled between January 29 and October 17, 2018, clinical benefit was achieved in 25 (56∙8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 41∙0–71∙7), objective response in 18 (40∙9%, 95% CI: 26∙3–56∙8), median progression-free survival was 6∙0 months (95% CI: 3∙7–8∙4), and 1-year overall survival was 59∙1% (95% CI: 45∙8–76∙2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade were neutropenia (20 [45∙5%]), anaemia (17 [38∙6%]), alopecia (19 [43∙2%]), asthenia (19 [43∙2%]), diarrhoea (14 [31∙8%]), fatigue (14 [31∙8%]), and peripheral neuropathy (12 [27∙3%]). Serious AEs occurred in 14 (31∙8%) patients including febrile neutropenia (3 [6∙8%]), neutropenia (2 [4∙5%]), fever (2 [4∙5%]) and peripheral neuropathy (2 [4∙5%]). Immune-related AEs occurred in 11 (25∙0%) patients. One (2∙3%) patient died of cardiac arrest unrelated to study treatment.

      Conclusion

      Pembrolizumab plus eribulin demonstrates encouraging antitumour activity in patients with heavily pre-treated, HR+, HER2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic BC. The safety and tolerability of the combination is similar to eribulin or pembrolizumab monotherapy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rugo H.S.
        • Delord J.-P.
        • Im S.-A.
        • Ott P.A.
        • Piha-Paul S.A.
        • Bedard P.L.
        • et al.
        Safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24: 2804-2811https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3452
        • Turner N.C.
        • Neven P.
        • Loibl S.
        • Andre F.
        Advances in the treatment of advanced oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 2403-2414https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32419-9
        • Colleoni M.
        • Sun Z.
        • Price K.N.
        • Karlsson P.
        • Forbes J.F.
        • Thürlimann B.
        • et al.
        Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 Years of follow-up: results from the International breast cancer study group trials I to V.
        J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 927-935https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3504
        • Cortes J.
        • O'Shaughnessy J.
        • Loesch D.
        • Blum J.L.
        • Vahdat L.T.
        • Petrakova K.
        • et al.
        Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 914-923https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60070-6
        • Kaufman P.A.
        • Awada A.
        • Twelves C.
        • Yelle L.
        • Perez E.A.
        • Velikova G.
        • et al.
        Phase III open-label randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane.
        J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33: 594-601https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4892
        • Black M.
        • Barsoum I.B.
        • Truesdell P.
        • Cotechini T.
        • Macdonald-Goodfellow S.K.
        • Petroff M.
        • et al.
        Activation of the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint confers tumor cell chemoresistance associated with increased metastasis.
        Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 10557-10567https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7235
        • Wein L.
        • Luen S.J.
        • Savas P.
        • Salgado R.
        • Loi S.
        Checkpoint blockade in the treatment of breast cancer: current status and future directions.
        Br J Cancer. 2018; 119: 4-11https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0126-6
        • Nanda R.
        • Chow L.Q.M.
        • Dees E.C.
        • Berger R.
        • Gupta S.
        • Geva R.
        • et al.
        Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 2460-2467https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.8931
        • Adams S.
        • Loi S.
        • Toppmeyer D.
        • Cescon D.W.
        • Laurentiis M.D.
        • Nanda R.
        • et al.
        Pembrolizumab monotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-positive, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: cohort B of the phase II KEYNOTE-086 study.
        Ann Oncol. 2019; 30: 405-411https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy518
        • Adams S.
        • Schmid P.
        • Rugo H.S.
        • Winer E.P.
        • Loirat D.
        • Awada A.
        • et al.
        Pembrolizumab monotherapy for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: cohort A of the phase II KEYNOTE-086 study.
        Ann Oncol. 2019; 30: 397-404https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy517
        • Cortés J.
        • Lipatov O.
        • Im S.-A.
        • Gonçalves A.
        • Lee K.S.
        • Schmid P.
        • et al.
        LBA21 - KEYNOTE-119: phase III study of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus single-agent chemotherapy (chemo) for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC).
        Ann Oncol. 2019; 30: v859-v860https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz394.010
        • Schmid P.
        • Adams S.
        • Rugo H.S.
        • Schneeweiss A.
        • Barrios C.H.
        • Iwata H.
        • et al.
        Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 2108-2121https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1809615
        • Schmid P.
        • Rugo H.S.
        • Adams S.
        • Schneeweiss A.
        • Barrios C.H.
        • Iwata H.
        • et al.
        Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21: 44-59https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30689-8
        • Cortes J.
        • Cescon D.W.
        • Rugo H.S.
        • Nowecki Z.
        • Im S.-A.
        • Yusof M.M.
        • et al.
        Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.
        Lancet. 2020; 396: 1817-1828https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32531-9
        • FDA
        FDA grants accelerated approval to pembrolizumab for locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic triple negative breast cancer.
        FDA, 2020
        • Nanda R.
        • Liu M.C.
        • Yau C.
        • Shatsky R.
        • Pusztai L.
        • Wallace A.
        • et al.
        Effect of pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response in women with early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the ongoing phase 2 adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial.
        JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6: 676-684https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6650
        • Dirix L.Y.
        • Takacs I.
        • Jerusalem G.
        • Nikolinakos P.
        • Arkenau H.-T.
        • Forero-Torres A.
        • et al.
        Avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a phase 1b JAVELIN Solid Tumor study.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 167: 671-686https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4537-5
      1. KEYTRUDA 25 mg/mL concentrate for solution for infusion - Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) - (emc) n.d. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/2498/smpc#gref (accessed December 29, 2020).

        • Baik C.S.
        • Rubin E.H.
        • Forde P.M.
        • Mehnert J.M.
        • Collyar D.
        • Butler M.O.
        • et al.
        Immuno-oncology clinical trial design: limitations, challenges, and opportunities.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23: 4992-5002https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3066
        • Seymour L.
        • Bogaerts J.
        • Perrone A.
        • Ford R.
        • Schwartz L.H.
        • Mandrekar S.
        • et al.
        iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics.
        Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18: e143-e152https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8
        • Guo W.
        • Lu X.
        • Liu Q.
        • Zhang T.
        • Li P.
        • Qiao W.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for breast cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis of 17079 individuals.
        Cancer Med. 2019; 8: 4135-4148https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2281
        • Miyoshi Y.
        • Yoshimura Y.
        • Saito K.
        • Muramoto K.
        • Sugawara M.
        • Alexis K.
        • et al.
        High absolute lymphocyte counts are associated with longer overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin-but not with treatment of physician's choice-in the EMBRACE study.
        Breast Cancer. 2020; 27: 706-715https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01067-2
        • Tolaney S.M.
        • Barroso-Sousa R.
        • Keenan T.
        • Li T.
        • Trippa L.
        • Vaz-Luis I.
        • et al.
        Effect of eribulin with or without pembrolizumab on progression-free survival for patients with hormone receptor–positive, ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA Oncology. 2020; 6: 1598-1605https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3524