Advertisement
Editorial Comment| Volume 131, P98-99, May 2020

Download started.

Ok

Comment on “Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: European consensus–based interdisciplinary guidelines”

  • Lieke C.J. van Delft
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Mastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 5800, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands.
    Affiliations
    Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands

    GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Medical Centre+
    Search for articles by this author
  • Eva van Loo
    Affiliations
    Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands

    GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Medical Centre+
    Search for articles by this author
  • Klara Mosterd
    Affiliations
    Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands

    GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Medical Centre+
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nicole W.J. Kelleners-Smeets
    Affiliations
    Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands

    GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Medical Centre+
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 13, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.002
      The European interdisciplinary guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are a thorough updated and expanded review of the literature [
      • Peris K.
      • et al.
      Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guidelines.
      ]. The guidelines provide guidance for physicians to optimise BCC care. We strongly agree with emphasising personalised care and an individualised approach for each patient and tumour. In addition, we would like to comment on the extensive safety margins advised for conventional (2D) surgical excision of high-risk BCCs and the proposed frequent follow-up of patients with a history of BCC.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Peris K.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guidelines.
        Eur J Cancer. 2019; 118: 10-34
        • Reiter O.
        • et al.
        The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 80: 1380-1388
        • Baum C.
        • et al.
        Guidelines of care for the management of basal cell carcinoma.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018; 78: 540-559
        • Breuninger H.
        • et al.
        The margin of safety and depth of excision in surgical treatment of basalioma. Use of 3-dimensional histologic study of 2,016 tumors.
        Hautarzt. 1989; 40: 693-700
        • Nahhas A.F.
        • Scarbrough C.A.
        • Trotter S.
        A review of the global guidelines on surgical margins for nonmelanoma skin cancers.
        J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017; 10: 37-46
        • Wolf D.J.
        • Zitelli J.A.
        Surgical margins for basal cell carcinoma.
        Arch Dermatol. 1987; 123: 340-344
        • Cameron M.C.
        • Lee E.
        • Hibler B.P.
        • Giordano C.N.
        • Barker C.A.
        • Mori S.
        • et al.
        Basal cell carcinoma: contemporary approaches to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018; 80: 321-339
        • Wheless L.
        • Black J.
        • Alberg A.J.
        Nonmelanoma skin cancer and the risk of second primary cancers: a systematic review.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19: 1686-1695
        • Verkouteren J.A.C.
        • et al.
        Predicting the risk of a second basal cell carcinoma.
        J Investig Dermatol. 2015; 135: 2649-2656
        • van Loo E.
        • et al.
        Surgical excision versus Mohs' micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma of the face: a randomised clinical trial with 10 year follow-up.
        Eur J Cancer. 2014; 50: 3011-3020
        • Roozeboom M.H.
        • et al.
        Overall treatment success after treatment of primary superficial basal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials.
        Br J Dermatol. 2012; 167: 733-756
        • Williams H.C.
        • et al.
        Surgery versus 5% imiquimod for nodular and superficial basal cell carcinoma: 5-year results of the SINS randomized controlled trial.
        J Investig Dermatol. 2017; 137: 614-619
        • Flohil S.C.
        • et al.
        Trends in Basal cell carcinoma incidence rates: a 37-year Dutch observational study.
        J Investig Dermatol. 2013; 133: 913-918

      Linked Article