Highlights
- •Safety consistent with previous experience: TEAEs are tolerable and mostly reversible.
- •No association between CPK abnormalities and muscle spasm.
- •Long-term vismodegib not associated with worsening frequency/severity of new TEAEs.
- •Response rates were 68.5% in locally advanced BCC and 36.9% in metastatic BCC.
- •Patients with Gorlin syndrome responded better to vismodegib.
Abstract
Background
The SafeTy Events in VIsmodEgib study (STEVIE, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01367665), assessed safety and efficacy of vismodegib—a first-in-class Hedgehog pathway inhibitor demonstrating clinical benefit in advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC)—in a patient population representative of clinical practice. Primary analysis data are presented.
Patients and methods
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCC received oral vismodegib 150 mg/d until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary objective was safety. Efficacy variables were assessed as secondary end-points.
Results
Evaluable adult patients (N = 1215, 1119 locally advanced; 96 metastatic BCC) from 36 countries were treated; 147 patients (12%) remained on study at time of reporting. Median (range) treatment duration was 8.6 (0–44) months. Most patients (98%) had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The incidence of the most common TEAEs was consistent with reports in previous analyses. No association between creatine phosphokinase (CPK) abnormalities and muscle spasm was observed. Serious TEAEs occurred in 289 patients (23.8%). Exposure ≥12 months did not lead to increased incidence or severity of new TEAEs. The majority of the most common TEAEs ongoing at time of treatment discontinuation resolved by 12 months afterwards, regardless of Gorlin syndrome status. Response rates (investigator-assessed) in patients with histologically confirmed measurable baseline disease were 68.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 65.7–71.3) in patients with locally advanced BCC and 36.9% (95% CI 26.6–48.1) in patients with metastatic BCC.
Conclusions
The primary analysis of STEVIE demonstrates that vismodegib is tolerable in typical patients in clinical practice; safety profile is consistent with that in previous reports. Long-term exposure was not associated with worsening severity/frequency of TEAEs. Investigator-assessed response rates showed high rate of tumour control.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01367665.
Keywords
1. Introduction
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) constitutes approximately 80% of non-melanoma skin cancers and is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide [
1
, 2
]. Although most BCCs are curable by surgery, disease may progress to advanced BCC (locally advanced/metastatic BCC), for which radiotherapy and surgery are inappropriate because cure is unlikely and/or because surgery might result in substantial deformity [3
, 4
].The key molecular driver in the development of BCC is abnormal Hedgehog pathway signalling, exhibited in >90% of BCCs [
[5]
]. Vismodegib is a first-in-class inhibitor of the Hedgehog signalling pathway.Vismodegib is approved (by the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] and the European Medicines Agency [EMA]) [
6
, 7
] for the treatment of adults with metastatic BCC or with locally advanced BCC that is inappropriate for surgery or radiotherapy. The pivotal phase II study ERIVANCE BCC demonstrated vismodegib response rates of 43% and 30% in patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCC, respectively, by independent review [[8]
]. Subsequent analyses from ERIVANCE BCC demonstrated durable responses and a consistent efficacy/safety profile [9
, 10
]. The SafeTy Events in VIsmodEgib study (STEVIE, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01367665) assesses safety and efficacy of vismodegib in a setting representative of clinical practice, and it is the largest study ever conducted in patients with BCC [[11]
]. We report results from the primary analysis of the total evaluable population (N = 1215, data cut-off March 16, 2015).2. Methods
2.1 Study design and patients
STEVIE is a single-arm, multicentre, open-label study involving 167 sites in 36 countries. The study design was previously published [
[11]
]. Eligible patients (≥18 years old) had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced/metastatic BCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2, and adequate organ function. For patients with locally advanced BCC, the lesion was deemed inoperable/inappropriate for surgery, and radiotherapy must have been previously administered, unless inappropriate. Patients with measurable and/or non-measurable disease, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, were eligible for enrolment. Patients with Gorlin syndrome who met inclusion criteria were also enrolled.The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards or independent ethics committees of participating centres, and the study was undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Patient safety was monitored by an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) that reviewed all aspects of safety, including death. All patients provided written informed consent.
Enrolled patients received oral vismodegib 150 mg/d continuously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death or other reasons for discontinuation. Dose reductions were not allowed; however, treatment interruption of up to 8 weeks was permitted for management of toxicity or temporary inability to swallow capsules.
Primary end-point was safety. Assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, defined as occurring between the first administration and 30 days after the last administration of study drug [inclusive] and assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE] version 4.0), limited physical examination, vital signs, ECOG performance status and laboratory parameters. Patients enrolled after approval of study protocol version 2 had five safety follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the last dose of vismodegib to assess resolution of TEAEs ongoing at the time of treatment discontinuation and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included investigator-assessed objective response according to RECIST v1.1, duration of response (DOR, time from date of earliest response to date of progressive disease [PD] or death), time to response (TTR, time from date of first treatment to date of first documentation of confirmed complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]), PFS (time from date of first therapy to date of progression or death) and overall survival (OS, time from date of first treatment to date of death). Information on quality of life, assessed by Skindex-16 and impact of treatment on disease symptoms in patients with metastatic BCC assessed by MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), will be published separately.
Tumour assessment by physical examination was performed every 4–8 weeks. When necessary, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed every 8–16 weeks.
2.2 Statistical analysis
The sample size was selected to allow the adverse event (AE) incidence rate to be estimated within 1.6% and 1.8% of the true AE rate, assuming an observed incidence of 10% (i.e. within a 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval [CI] of 8.4–11.8) and with a precision to estimate an AE of 1% frequency to within 0.5% and 1% of the true AE rate.
The efficacy-evaluable population included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had histologically confirmed disease at baseline (used for PFS and OS analysis). Patients who also had measurable disease at baseline were included in best overall response rate (BORR) and TTR assessments. All time-to-event end-points were analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method; 95% CIs were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
3. Results
3.1 Patient demographics and characteristics
Between June 2011 and September 2014, 1232 patients were enrolled in STEVIE at 167 sites in 36 countries. Seventeen patients were excluded from the safety and efficacy analysis (no documented exposure based on return of drug dispensed), leaving 1215 evaluable patients (1119 locally advanced, 96 metastatic BCC; Supplementary Fig. S1). Table 1 shows baseline characteristics. At the time of clinical cut-off, 147 patients (12%) were receiving treatment with vismodegib. TEAEs were the main reason for treatment discontinuation (n = 349).
Table 1Baseline characteristics and demographics of all patients given study drug.
Locally advanced BCC n = 1119 | Metastatic BCC n = 96 | All patients n = 1215 | |
---|---|---|---|
Men, n (%) | 634 (56.7) | 60 (62.5) | 694 (57.1) |
Women, n (%) | 485 (43.3) | 36 (37.5) | 521 (42.9) |
Women of childbearing potential, n (%) | 57 (11.8) | 5 (13.9) | 62 (11.9) |
Age, mean (SD), years | 69.7 (16.1) | 66.6 (13.0) | 69.5 (15.9) |
Age, median (range), years | 72.0 (18–101) | 67.0 (34–95) | 72.0 (18–101) |
Age group <65 years, n (%) | 382 (34.1) | 43 (44.8) | 425 (35.0) |
Age group ≥65 years, n (%) | 737 (65.9) | 53 (55.2) | 790 (65.0) |
Baseline ECOG performance status, n (%) | |||
Grade 0 | 662 (59.2) | 39 (40.6) | 701 (57.7) |
Grade 1 | 316 (28.3) | 42 (43.8) | 358 (29.5) |
Grade 2 | 138 (12.3) | 15 (15.6) | 153 (12.6) |
Gorlin syndrome, n (%) | |||
Yes | 214 (19.2) | 5 (5.2) | 219 (18.1) |
No | 899 (80.8) | 91 (94.8) | 990 (81.9) |
Median time since first diagnosis, years | 8.35 | 7.82 | 8.31 |
Diagnosis histologically confirmed, n (%) | |||
Yes | 1111 (99.3) | 89 (92.7) | 1200 (98.8) |
No | 8 (0.7) | 7 (7.3) | 15 (1.2) |
Ineligibility for surgery, n (%) | |||
Inoperable | 433 (38.7) | – | 433 (35.6) |
Surgery contraindicated | 686 (61.3) | – | 686 (56.5) |
Substantial morbidity and/or deformity anticipated | 385 (34.4) | – | 385 (31.7) |
Unlikely to be curatively resected, n (%) | 328 (29.3) | – | 328 (27.0) |
Other, n (%) | 88 (7.9) | – | 88 (7.2) |
Previous radiotherapy, n (%) | |||
Yes | 312 (27.9) | 59 (61.5) | 371 (30.5) |
No | 806 (72.0) | 37 (38.5) | 843 (69.4) |
Contraindicated | 340 (30.4) | 11 (11.5) | 351 (28.9) |
Inappropriate | 466 (41.6) | 26 (27.1) | 492 (40.5) |
Sites of disease, n (%) | |||
Skin | 1102 (98.5) | 32 (33.3) | 1134 (93.3) |
Extremity | 141 (12.6) | 5 (5.2) | 146 (12.0) |
Head | 838 (74.9) | 12 (12.5) | 850 (70.0) |
Neck | 125 (11.2) | 9 (9.4) | 134 (11.0) |
Trunk | 245 (21.9) | 10 (10.4) | 255 (21.0) |
Other skin | 194 (17.3) | 8 (8.3) | 202 (16.6) |
Bone | – | 31 (32.3) | 31 (2.6) |
Liver | – | 8 (8.3) | 8 (0.7) |
Lung | – | 63 (65.6) | 63 (5.2) |
Lymph nodes | – | 30 (31.3) | 30 (2.5) |
Lymph nodes local regional | 5 (0.4) | – | 5 (0.4) |
Other site | 28 (2.5) | 13 (13.5) | 41 (3.4) |
Disease status, n (%) | |||
Measurable | 1085 (97.0) | 91 (94.8) | 1176 (96.8) |
Non-measurable | 26 (2.3) | 5 (5.2) | 31 (2.6) |
Total number of target lesions at baseline (median, range) | 2216 (2, 1–12) | 221 (2, 1–6) | 2437 (2, 1–12) |
BCC = basal cell carcinoma; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
a Patients who refused surgery or had other contraindications for medical or surgical reasons.
3.2 Safety
Most patients (1192 [98%]) had ≥1 TEAE on study; the most common (>20% incidence) TEAEs were muscle spasms (807 [66%]), alopecia (747 [62%]), dysgeusia (663 [55%]), decreased weight (493 [41%]), decreased appetite (303 [25%]) and asthenia (291 [24%]) (Supplementary Table S1). A similar safety profile was observed regardless of Gorlin syndrome status (Supplementary Table S2). To address the impact of treatment exposure, rate of occurrence of TEAEs per 100 patient–years of exposure was calculated (Table 2). The higher rates observed during the first 12 months suggest that there is no trend towards increased number of new TEAEs or grade ≥3 TEAEs with increased time on treatment. Serious TEAEs were reported in 289 patients (23.8%; 260 locally advanced; 29 metastatic BCC) (Supplementary Table S3).
Table 2TEAEs by length of exposure.
TEAE by preferred term | Number of events (events per 100 patient–years) | |
---|---|---|
Occurring <12 months' treatment (808.9 patient–years) | Occurring ≥12 months' treatment (288.1 patient–years) | |
Any grade | 8578 (1060.5) | 1128 (391.6) |
Muscle spasm | 793 (98.0) | 14 (4.9) |
Alopecia | 732 (90.5) | 15 (5.2) |
Dysgeusia | 647 (80.0) | 16 (5.6) |
Weight decreased | 454 (56.1) | 39 (13.5) |
Decreased appetite | 281 (34.7) | 22 (7.6) |
Asthenia | 269 (33.3) | 22 (7.6) |
Ageusia | 209 (25.8) | 4 (1.4) |
Nausea | 208 (25.7) | 10 (3.5) |
Fatigue | 190 (23.5) | 11 (3.8) |
Diarrhoea | 160 (19.8) | 37 (12.8) |
Arthralgia | 110 (13.6) | 14 (4.9) |
Constipation | 105 (13.0) | 11 (3.8) |
Headache | 87 (10.8) | 5 (1.7) |
Vomiting | 90 (11.1) | 12 (4.2) |
Anaemia | 60 (7.4) | 29 (10.1) |
CPK = creatine phosphokinase; GGT = gamma-glutamyl transferase; TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event.
For each preferred term, the total number of TEAEs occurring at a rate of at least 10 events per 100 patient–years is displayed. No grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred at ≥10 events per 100 patient–years. The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs in either time period were muscle spasm, weight decreased, GGT increased, hypertension, dysgeusia, asthenia, fatigue and blood CPK level increased. A patient can be counted in both exposure categories if their total duration is 12 months or more. TEAEs were defined as occurring between the first administration of study drug and 30 days after the last administration of study drug, inclusive.
A summary of deaths on study is included in Supplementary Table S4. Grade 5 (fatal) TEAEs occurred in 46 patients (3.8%); seven were considered related to vismodegib by the investigator but showed presence of comorbidities/risk factors in each case (Supplementary Table S5). The DSMB determined these cases to be unrelated to vismodegib (n = 6) or not assessable because of insufficient clinical data (n = 1).
The TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation reported in 380 patients (31%) were primarily grade 1/2. The most frequently reported TEAEs were muscle spasm (85 [7%]), dysgeusia (55 [5%]), weight decreased (47 [4%]), alopecia (39 [3%]), decreased appetite (37 [3%]), asthenia (35 [3%]), fatigue (27 [2%]), ageusia (23 [2%]) and nausea (13 [1%]).
Further evaluation of STEVIE showed that 51 patients (4%) with advanced BCC experienced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Most patients were aged >75 years with lesions located in sun-exposed areas; 18 patients (35%) had a history of cutaneous SCC, three patients (6%) had a history of Bowen disease, and two patients (4%) had a history of actinic keratosis.
Due to the prevalence of muscle spasm in patients taking Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HPIs), additional assessment of blood creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels was performed. The TEAE of increased blood CPK was reported in 60 patients (4.9%) (Supplementary Table S1). The exploratory analysis used quantitative laboratory data from patients for whom ≥1 CPK measurement was available during the treatment period and showed CPK elevations in 36.4% of patients who did not experience muscle spasm and 33.9% of patients who did experience muscle spasm (Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary Table S6).
An exploratory analysis of AE reversibility after treatment discontinuation included 266 patients who completed their 12-month follow-up. At the time of treatment discontinuation, 97% of patients had ≥1 ongoing AE. This decreased during the post-treatment phase, with 92.5%, 74.8%, 59.0%, 48.9% and 45.5% of patients having ongoing AEs at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S3). Analysis of the five most common TEAEs associated with vismodegib treatment—muscle spasm, alopecia, ageusia, dysgeusia and decreased weight—in Gorlin syndrome and non-Gorlin syndrome patient subgroups also showed a reduction in the proportion of patients with ongoing AEs during the post-treatment period (Supplementary Table S7). Most instances of muscle spasm resolved 1–3 months after treatment, and most occurrences of ageusia, dysgeusia and alopecia resolved by 6 months after treatment. Events of weight decreased took slightly longer to resolve; most patients experienced resolution by 12 months after treatment. There were no differences in TEAE resolution between patients with Gorlin syndrome and those without, and the pattern of resolution over time in the two subgroups was similar to that seen in the overall population. A number of patients began receiving commercial vismodegib at the 12-month follow-up visit (four patients with muscle spasms; six patients with alopecia; two patients with ageusia, five patients with dysgeusia and seven patients with weight decreased), confounding interpretability. After patients taking commercial vismodegib were excluded, the prevalence of ongoing AEs was 3.4% for muscle spasm, 8.1% for alopecia, 1.5% for ageusia, 3.4% for dysgeusia and 5.4% for weight decreased. Additional medical review of these ongoing cases showed that most were grade 1 and many of the patients with grade 2/3 AEs also had medical history/risk factors in addition to age that confounded the assessment of the AEs and attribution of the AEs to vismodegib treatment.
3.3 Efficacy
Median follow-up was 17.9 months, and 1161 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population had histologically confirmed measurable disease. Response rates were 68.5% (95% CI 65.7–71.3) in patients with locally advanced BCC and 36.9% (95% CI 26.6–48.1) in patients with metastatic BCC (Table 3), including CR in 33.4% and 4.8% of patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCC, respectively. Other end-points are described in Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. S4. OS data for patients in the efficacy-evaluable population (both cohorts) are immature; therefore, median OS was not estimable. Response rates in patients with Gorlin syndrome and histologically confirmed measurable disease were 81.7% (95% CI 75.8–86.7) and 80.0% (95% CI 28.4–99.5) in patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCC, respectively (Table 4).
Table 3Best confirmed overall response rate in patients with histologically confirmed and measurable disease.
Efficacy parameter | Locally advanced BCC | Metastatic BCC | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Patients with measurable disease at baseline, n | 1077 | 84 | 1161 |
Best overall response rate | |||
Responder, n (%) | 738 (68.5) | 31 (36.9) | 769 (66.2) |
95% CI | (65.66–71.29) | (26.63–48.13) | (63.43–68.96) |
Complete response, n (%) | 360 (33.4) | 4 (4.8) | 364 (31.4) |
Partial response, n (%) | 378 (35.1) | 27 (32.1) | 405 (34.9) |
Stable disease, n (%) | 270 (25.1) | 39 (46.4) | 309 (26.6) |
Progressive disease, n (%) | 21 (1.9) | 9 (10.7) | 30 (2.6) |
Missing or not evaluable, n (%) | 48 (4.5) | 5 (6.0) | 53 (4.6) |
Median time to response, n months (95% CI) | 1077 3.7 (2.9–3.7) | 84 NE (5.5–NE) | 1161 3.7 (3.5–3.7) |
Median duration of response, n months (95% CI) | 738 23.0 (20.4–26.7) | 31 13.9 (9.2–NE) | 175 22.7 (20.3–24.8) |
Median progression-free survival, n months (95% CI) | 1103 23.2 (21.4–26.0) | 89 13.1 (12.0–17.7) | 1192 22.1 (20.3–24.7) |
BCC = basal cell carcinoma; CI = confidence interval; NE = not estimable.
Data are n (%) based on the number of patients with measurable disease at baseline.
Table 4Best confirmed overall response rate in patients with histologically confirmed and measurable disease by Gorlin syndrome status.
Efficacy parameter | Locally advanced BCC | Metastatic BCC | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
With Gorlin n = 213 | Without Gorlin n = 884 | With Gorlin n = 5 | Without Gorlin n = 84 | With Gorlin n = 218 | Without Gorlin n = 968 | |
Patients with measurable disease at baseline, n | 208 | 863 | 5 | 79 | 213 | 942 |
Best overall response rate | ||||||
Responder, n (%) | 170 (81.7) | 566 (65.6) | 4 (80.0) | 27 (34.2) | 174 (81.7) | 593 (63.0) |
95% CI | 75.8–86.7 | 62.3–68.8 | 28.4–99.5 | 23.9–45.7 | 75.8–86.6 | 59.8–66.0 |
Complete response, n (%) | 95 (45.7) | 263 (30.5) | 1 (20.0) | 3 (3.8) | 96 (45.1) | 266 (28.2) |
Partial response, n (%) | 75 (36.1) | 303 (35.1) | 3 (60.0) | 24 (30.4) | 78 (36.6) | 327 (34.7) |
Stable disease, n (%) | 31 (14.9) | 236 (27.3) | 1 (20.0) | 38 (48.1) | 32 (15.0) | 274 (29.1) |
Progressive disease, n (%) | 1 (0.5) | 20 (2.3) | – | 9 (11.4) | 1 (0.5) | 29 (3.1) |
Missing or not evaluable, n (%) | 6 (2.9) | 41 (4.8) | – | 5 (6.3) | 6 (2.8) | 46 (4.9) |
Median time to response, (95% CI), months | 2.9 (2.8–3.7) | 3.7 (3.0–3.7) | 2.0 (1.0–NE) | NE (6.5–NE) | 2.9 (2.8–3.7) | 3.7 (3.7–3.8) |
Median duration of response, (95% CI), months | 28.8 (24.8–NE) | 18.7 (16.8–21.1) | 15.1 (13.9–16.2) | 11.0 (8.3–NE) | 28.8 (24.8–NE) | 18.5 (16.4–20.8) |
BCC = basal cell carcinoma; CI = confidence interval; NE = not estimable.
Data are n (%) based on the number of patients with measurable disease at baseline.
a Analysis based on responders only.
4. Discussion
The STEVIE patient population is analogous to the real-world setting of advanced BCC because patients were elderly (median 72.0 years in locally advanced BCC) with a high level of comorbidities (91.7%) at baseline. A disease registry evaluating real-world practice in the United States (RegiSONIC study) supports similarities between the STEVIE population and patients treated in routine medical practice, reporting a median age of newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced BCC of 68 years [
[12]
]. Epidemiology studies in metastatic BCC have demonstrated a higher predominance of metastatic BCC in males (69%) similar to that in STEVIE (63%) and a similar pattern of disease spread; the most common sites are lymph nodes, lung and bone [[13]
]. The primary analysis results demonstrate a consistent safety profile with that previously reported for vismodegib in patients with advanced BCC [8
, 9
, 10
, 11
].Commonly occurring AEs are similar to those seen with other HPIs; most patients experience muscle spasm, alopecia and taste disturbances (ageusia/dysgeusia) [
11
, 14
]. Although muscle-related AEs such as muscle spasm are seen with all HPIs, increases in CPK level in patients taking vismodegib in STEVIE were mostly mild and asymptomatic. TEAEs of increased CPK level were reported in 5% of patients in STEVIE (mainly grade 1/2), with increased CPK level in 64 of 432 patients (14.8%) with available laboratory samples included in the exploratory analysis. TEAEs of increased blood CPK level occurred in ≥30% of patients treated with sonidegib despite the exclusion of patients treated with drugs that might cause muscle damage [[14]
]. There were no reports of rhabdomyolysis in STEVIE. Exploratory analysis did not demonstrate any association between CPK abnormalities and muscle spasm or any clinically relevant sequelae, including renal insufficiency.As experience with HPIs has increased, questions have arisen regarding the development of cutaneous SCC after exposure to vismodegib and the persistence of AEs after drug discontinuation [
15
, 16
]. Data from this large patient population with advanced BCC provide further understanding regarding these events, such as prevalence and risk factors.The causality assessment in SCC is challenging because the observation occurred in a single-arm study and there is a known increased risk for developing new SCCs in patients with a history of BCC [
17
, 18
]. However, the incidence of cutaneous SCC in STEVIE was 4.2%, in contrast with the 12.5% observed in ERIVANCE BCC and consistent with the expected incidence based on literature in a similar population [[19]
]. A recent meta-analysis estimating the risk for subsequent SCC in patients with a history of BCC reported a pooled estimate proportion of 4.3% (95% CI 1.7–10.1%) [[18]
]. Nevertheless, the current analysis is limited by the lack of histological data and a control arm in STEVIE.Case reports of persistent AEs have been described with vismodegib treatment [
[19]
]. STEVIE showed that the majority of common AEs associated with vismodegib treatment (muscle spasm, alopecia, ageusia, dysgeusia and decreased weight) that were ongoing at the time of treatment discontinuation resolved by 12 months after treatment discontinuation. The remaining cases were mostly mild, and confounding factors were present in all cases. The presence of ongoing AEs >6 months after treatment discontinuation might be related to the persistent blood levels of vismodegib due to the long half-life of this protein-bound drug, or it may be related to the physiological process associated with the AE (e.g. the kinetics of the hair growth cycle).In the current study, most TEAEs that led to treatment discontinuation were grade 1/2, and 147 patients remain on treatment at the time of this report, demonstrating that the chronicity of AEs rather than the severity can lead to discontinuation. Management of TEAEs is essential to optimise treatment benefit; educating patients on what to expect and possible management options is important. Management recommendations that provide guidance for healthcare professionals have been published [
20
, 21
, 22
, 23
], and physicians should consult their local prescribing information for guidance on management of TEAEs.Efficacy in this analysis was consistent with the previously reported efficacy profile of vismodegib in advanced BCC [
10
, 11
]. Response rates of 68.5% and 36.9% in patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCC, respectively, in STEVIE are consistent with those reported by investigators in ERIVANCE BCC at the final (30-month) analysis (60.3% and 48.5%), respectively [[10]
]; DOR and PFS were also consistent with those of the final analysis of ERIVANCE BCC. The Gorlin subgroup analysis indicates that patients with Gorlin syndrome responded better to treatment, with a considerably higher rate of CR (45.1%) than patients without Gorlin syndrome (28.2%), which might be a result of these patients being younger and having a better ECOG performance status than patients without Gorlin syndrome. However, it is clear that response rates in the whole study population were not influenced by the inclusion of patients with Gorlin syndrome because they were similar to response rates in the subgroup of patients without Gorlin syndrome.Limitations of STEVIE include the absence of a control arm and the lack of independent central review [
[8]
]; however, the STEVIE population is reflective of real-world patients seen in everyday practice. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to the decision to treat patients with advanced BCC with use of HPIs. Close follow-up of patients after treatment initiation is necessary to manage TEAEs and assess continued benefit of treatment.Results from the primary analysis of STEVIE show that vismodegib has a manageable and consistent safety profile in a population representative of patients treated in routine clinical practice. Treatment with vismodegib led to tumour response and control and should be considered for this difficult-to-treat patient group.
Funding support and role of the sponsor
Funding for this study was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. (no grant number). This study was designed by the investigators and representatives of the funder. Funder representatives participated in study design; study steering committee meetings; the gathering, analysis or interpretation of the data; and writing of the report and had access to the raw data. The funder was responsible for data gathering and analysis. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and subsequent writing, reviewing and amendment of the manuscript. The funder financed writing and editorial support. All authors vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the reported data and attest that the study conformed to the protocol and statistical analysis plan. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following: Nicole Basset-Séguin: employee of Genentch/F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; honoraria from Galderma, Leo, Pierre Fabre, Novartis and Roche; consulting or advisory role for Galderma, Leo, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Roche; patents, royalties, or other intellectual property from Genentech/F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; travel, accommodations, or expenses from Galderma, Leo and Roche. Natalie Dimier: employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., and holds stock or other ownership. Alberto Fittipaldo: employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., and holds stock or other ownership. IoannisXynos: employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., and holds stock or other ownership. Reinhard Dummer: honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche; consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche; research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche. Kate Fife: honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Roche; consulting or advisory role for Pfizer and Roche; research funding from AstraZeneca and Roche; travel, accommodations or expenses from Novartis and Roche. Jean-Jacques Grob: honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche; consulting or advisory role Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche; speaker's bureau for GlaxoSmithKline and Roche; research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche; travel, accommodations or expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. Axel Hauschild: honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, MELA Sciences, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme/Merck, Novartis, Oncosec and Roche; consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, MELA Sciences, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Oncosec and Roche; research funding from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, MELA Sciences, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Oncosec and Roche; travel, accommodations, or expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, MELA Sciences, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Oncosec and Roche. Rainer Kunstfeld: honoraria from Meda, Menarini, Novartis and Roche; consulting or advisory role for Leo, Meda, Menarini, Novartis, Roche and Sprig. Nicolas Meyer: honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Roche; consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche; expert testimony for Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche; travel, accommodations or expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche. Paulo A. Ascierto: consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Array, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Genentech/Roche and Ventana; research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche and Ventana. Brigitte Dreno: consulting or advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Roche; speaker's bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline and Roche; research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline and Roche; travel, accommodations or expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche. Johan Hansson: consulting or advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche; research funding from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche. Lisa Licitra: consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche and Sobi. Laurent Mortier: consulting or advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharpe & Dohme and Roche; research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, CSO Pharma (institution), GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Roche; travel, accommodations or expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. Ana Raimundo: consulting or advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche; speaker's bureau for Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche; travel, accommodations or expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. Petr Arenberger, Emi Dika, Caroline Dutriaux, Bernard Guillot, Luc Thomas: no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the patients and their families and the investigators and research teams who participated in this study (a full list of investigators is provided in Appendix 1). The authors also thank Laurence Lehuu (Global Study Leader) and Christian Hertig, Daniela Stokmaier and Maneesh Tandon (Clinical Science) for help in cleaning and interpreting the data and Rina Adak (ApotheCom, London, UK) for medical editorial assistance.
Appendix 1. List of investigators, sites and patients enrolled
Tabled
1
Investigator | Centre | Patients enrolled |
---|---|---|
Rainer Kunstfeld | AKH Wien; Klinische Abteilung für allgemeine Dermatologie | 61 |
Jean-Jacques Grob | Hopital Timone Adultes; Dermatologie | 61 |
Brigitte Dreno | Hopital Hotel Dieu Et Hme; Clinique Dermatologique | 50 |
Laurent Mortier | Centre Oscar Lambret; Hopital De Jour | 41 |
Paulo Ascierto | Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale | 37 |
Lisa Licitra | Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori; S.S. Trattamento MedicoTumori dellaTesta e delCollo | 33 |
Caroline Dutriaux | Hopital Saint Andre CHU De Bordeaux; Dermatologie | 29 |
Luc Thomas | Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud; Dermatologie | 27 |
Nicolas Meyer | Hôpital Larrey Université Paul Sabatier; Service Dermatologie | 25 |
Bernard Guillot | Hopital Saint Eloi; CHU de Montpellier; Svc de Dermatologie | 24 |
Reinhard Dummer | Universitätsspital Zürich; Dermatologische Klinik | 23 |
Nicole Basset-Seguin | Hopital Saint Louis; Dermatologie 1 | 23 |
Pertr Arenberger | Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady | 20 |
Kate Fife | Addenbrookes Hospital; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, S4 Box 279 | 19 |
Johan Hansson | Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna | 18 |
Ana Raimundo | IPO do Porto; Servico de Oncologia Medica | 17 |
Annalisa Patrizi | Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi; U.O. Dermatologia | 16 |
Eric Winquist | London Regional Cancer Centre, London, Ontario, Canada | 15 |
Verónica Ruiz Soles | Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau; Servicio de Dermatologia | 15 |
Carlos Guillen Barona | Instituto Valenciano Oncologia; Oncologia Medica | 13 |
Caroline Robert | Institut Gustave Roussy; Comite 5 | 13 |
Alfonso Berrocal Jaime | Hospital General Universitario de Valencia; Servicio de oncologia | 12 |
Ekaterina Peycheva | National Specialized Hospital for Active Oncology Treatment; Dermatology Clinic | 12 |
Pablo Fernandez-Penas | Skin and Cancer Foundation Australia | 11 |
Pierre vabres | Chu Site Du Bocage; Dermatologie | 11 |
Sergio Chimenti | Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata; Dermatologia | 11 |
Ralf Gutzmer | Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie | 11 |
Georgy Moiseevich Manikhas | Saint-Petersburg City Clinical Oncology Dispensary | 11 |
Piergiacomo Calzavara Pinton | Università di Brescia; Dipartimento di Dermatologia | 11 |
Claus Garbe | Universitaets-Hautklinik Tuebingen | 10 |
Nowell Solish | Dr. Nowell Solish Cosmetic Dermatology | 10 |
Maria Concetta Fargnoli | Ospedale San Salvatore (ASL-01); Dip. di Dermatologia U.O.S. di Dermatologia Oncol | 10 |
Ellen de Haas | Erasmus MC; Dermatology | 10 |
Evgeny Levchenko | FSBI Research Oncology Institute n.a. N.N. Petrov of Ministry of Health and Social Development | 10 |
Peter Foley | Skin & Cancer Foundation | 9 |
Franz Trautinger | Landesklinikum St. Pölten | 9 |
Alessandro Testori | Irccs Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia (IEO); Oncologia Medica | 9 |
Yves Poulin | Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec Metropolitain (CRDQ) | 9 |
Santora Armando | IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas; Farmacia | 8 |
Alexander Stratigos | Andreas Syggros Hospital; 1st University Dermatology Clinic; Oncology Department | 8 |
Dirk Schadendorf | Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Dermatologie | 8 |
Patrick Schöffski | U.Z. Gasthuisberg; Gezwelziekten – Medische Oncologie | 8 |
Carola Berking | Klinikum der LMU München; Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie | 8 |
Francesco De Rosa | I.R.S.T. Srl – Meldola – FC; Day Hospital Oncologico | 8 |
Dedee Murrell | Premier Specialists | 8 |
Ioannis Bassukas | University General Hospital of loannina; Dermatology and Venereal Diseases Clinic | 7 |
Eva Brun | Skånes Onkologiska Klinik Universitetssjukhusest | 7 |
Robert Herd | Western Infirmary; Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences | 7 |
Martin Leverkus | Klinikum Mannheim Klinik fuer Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie | 7 |
Luis De La Cruz Merino | Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Servicio de Oncologia | 7 |
Vincenzo De Giorgi | Ospedale IOT-Palagi Dermatologia 2 | 7 |
Roland Kaufmann | Klinikum Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Uni.; Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie | 7 |
Susana Puig Sardá | Hospital Clinic i Provincial; Servicio de dermatología | 7 |
Gilberto Castro Junior | Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo – ICESP | 6 |
Suayib Yalcin | Hacettepe Uni Medical Faculty Hospital; Oncology Department | 6 |
Mariusz Sapijaszko | Western Canada Dermatology Institute | 6 |
Janja Ocvirk | Institute of Oncology Ljubljana | 6 |
Lev Demidov | Russian Cancer Research Center | 6 |
Lidija Kandolf Sekulovic | Military Medical Academy | 6 |
Marni Wiseman | Cancer Care Manitoba | 6 |
Zygmunt Adamski | Centrum Diagnostyki Znamion | 6 |
Paola Queirolo | IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Per La Ricerca Sul Cancro (IST); Oncologia Medica A | 6 |
Gabriella Liszkay | Orszagos Onkologiai Intezet; Borgyogyaszati Osztaly | 6 |
Sari Pitkänen | Helsinki University Central Hospital; Skin & Allergy Hospital | 6 |
Jessica Hassel | Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg | 6 |
Yvetta Vantuchová | Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava; Kožní oddělení | 5 |
Ivana Krajsová | Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze | 5 |
Elkin Peñaranda | Riesgo De Fractura; Rheumatology | 5 |
Mirna Situm | Clinical Hospital Sisters of Mercy | 5 |
Sergio Azevedo | Hospital das Clinicas – UFRGS | 5 |
Michele Maio | A.O.U. Senese Policlinico Santa Maria Alle Scotte | 5 |
Massimo Aglietta | Fondazione Del Piemonte Per L'oncologia Ircc Di Candiolo; Dipartimento Oncologico | 5 |
Laima Plesniene | National Cancer Institute | 5 |
Slavomir Urbancek | Facultna Nemocnica Roosevelta | 5 |
Ricardo Fernández de Misa | Complejo Hospitalario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria; Servicio de Dermato | 5 |
Teresa Guerrero Urbano | St Thomas Hospital | 5 |
Rudolf Herbst | HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt, Klinik für Hautkrankheiten und Allergologie | 5 |
Uwe Martens | Klinikum am Gesundbrunnen; Tumorzentrum | 5 |
Klara Mosterd | Maastricht University Medical Centre; Dermatologie | 5 |
Javier Medina Martinez | Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo-H. Virgen de la Salud; Servicio de Dermatologia | 5 |
Gregorio Carretero Hernández | Hospital de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin; Servicio de Dermatologia | 5 |
Julie Gehl | Herlev Hospital; Onkologisk afdeling | 5 |
Roxana Del Aguila | Inst. De Oncologia Angel H. Roffo; Servicio De Oncologia | 4 |
Patrizio Mulas | Ospedale Armando Businco; Dermatologia | 4 |
Ruth Plummer | Freeman Hospital; Northern Centre for Cancer Care | 4 |
John Lear | Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust | 4 |
Tudor Eliade Ciuleanu | Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta Institutul Oncologic | 4 |
Luciano Viana | Hospital de Cancer de Barretos | 4 |
Ingrid Wolf | LKH Graz; Abteilung für allgemeine Dermatologie | 4 |
Axel Hauschild | UNI-Klinikum Campus Kiel Klinik f.Dermatologie Tagesklinik f.Dermatologie | 4 |
Anja Gesierich | Universitätsklinikum Würzburg Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie Venerologie u. Allergologie | 4 |
Laura Eibenschutz | Istituto Dermatologico San Gallicano IRCCS; Dermatologia Oncolgica | 4 |
Steven Bernstein | Victoria Park MediSpa | 4 |
Jose Luis López Estebaranz | Fundacion Hospital de Alcorcon; Servicio de Dermatologia | 4 |
Erwin Schultz | Klinikum Nürnberg Nord; Hautklinik | 4 |
Saverio Cinieri | Ospedale Antonio Perrino; Oncologia Medica | 4 |
Remco van Doorn | LUMC; Dermatologie | 4 |
Richard Martin | Waitemata District Health; General Surgery | 4 |
Michelle Murphy | Cork University Hospital; Dermatology Dept | 3 |
Giuseppe Gullo | St Vincent's Uni Hospital; Medical Oncology | 3 |
Sarolta Karpati | Semmelweis Egyetem; Bor-, Nemikortani es Boronkologiai Klinika | 3 |
Jens Ulrich | Klinikum Dorothea Ch.Erxleben; Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie | 3 |
Peter Mohr | Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude Dermatologisches Zentrum | 3 |
Martin Kaatz | SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera; Klinik für Hautkrankheiten und Allergologie | 3 |
Danil Stroyakovskiy | Moscow city oncology hospital #62 of Moscow Healthcare Department | 3 |
Stefano Calvieri | Azienda Ospedaliera Umberto I; Clinica Dermatologica | 3 |
Sebnem Ozkan | Dokuz Eylul University Medicine Faculty; Dermatology | 3 |
Isil Somali | Dokuz Eylul University Medicine Faculty; Dermatology | 3 |
Maria Luisa Zubiri Ara | Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet; Servicio Dermatologia | 3 |
Andrzej Kaszuba | DERMED Centrum Medyczne; Sp zoo | 3 |
Cornelia Toganel | Spital Clinic Judetean Mures; Oncologie | 3 |
Åse Bratland | Oslo Universitetssykehus HF; Radiumhospitalet | 3 |
Josef Koller | LKH Salzburg; Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie | 3 |
Gergana Shalamanova-Deleva | District Oncology Dispensary; Department for Oncology and Dermatology | 3 |
Cornelia Mauch | Klinik der Uni zu Köln; Klinik & Poliklinik fuer Dermatologie & Venerologie | 3 |
Jose Antonio Lopez Martin Jose | Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Servicio de Oncologia | 3 |
Philippe Saiag | Hopital Ambroise Pare; SCE Dermatologie | 3 |
Maria Agustina Segurado Rodriguez | Hospital Universitario del Sureste; Servicio de Dermatologia | 3 |
Jacob Schachter | Sheba Medical Center; Tel Hashomer | 3 |
Eyal Fenig | Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus | 3 |
Armin Bender | Universitätsklinikum Marburg Klinik f. Dermatologie | 3 |
Pedro Mercader Garcia | Hospital General Universitario J.M Morales Meseguer; Servicio de Dermatologia | 3 |
Alvaro Acosta | Inst. Nacional de Cancerologia; Clinica de Seno | 2 |
Natalia Jaimes | Hospital Pablo Tobin Uribe | 2 |
Shireen Sidhu | CMAX A division of IDT Australia Limited | 2 |
Predrag Nikolic | University Hospital Clinical Center Banja Luka | 2 |
Guillermo Jimenez | Reumalab Sas; Rheumatology | 2 |
Jitka Abrahamova | Facultni Thomayerova Nemocnice; Onkologicke Oddeleni | 2 |
Rauno Harvima | Kuopion yliopistollinen sairaala | 2 |
Wolfgang Harth | Vivantes Klinikum Spandau | 2 |
Patrick Terheyden | Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein; Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie | 2 |
Carsten Weishaupt | Universitätsklinikum Münster; Klinik fuer Hautkrankheiten | 2 |
Dorothée Nashan | Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH Klinikzentrum Mitte | 2 |
Vanna Chiarion Sileni | IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV); Oncologia Medica Seconda | 2 |
Roxolyana Adbah-Bortnyak | Rambam Medical Center | 2 |
Andrzej Cichocki | Centrum Onkologii – Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie; Klinika Onkologiczna | 2 |
Salvatore Siena | Asst Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda; Dipartimento Di Ematologia Ed Oncologia | 2 |
Paolo Marchetti | Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata (IDI)-IRCCS; IV Divisione Oncologica e Dermatologia Oncologica | 2 |
Jacek Jassem | Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne, Klinika Onkologii i Radioterapii | 2 |
Rodica Anghel | Institutul Oncologic Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu Bucuresti | 2 |
Jorge Frank | Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf; Hautklinik | 2 |
Ivan Marquez Rodas | Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon; Servicio de Oncologia | 2 |
Martin Gore | Royal Marsden Hospital | 2 |
Pablo Coto Segura | Hospital Univ. Central de Asturias; Servicio de Dermatologia | 2 |
Rafael Salido Vallejo | Hospital Reina Sofia; Servicio de dermatología | 2 |
José Carlos Moreno Gimenez | Hospital Reina Sofia; Servicio de dermatología | 2 |
Claas Ulrich | Campus Charité Mitte CharitéCentrum 12 Klinik für Dermatologie Venerologie und Allergologie | 1 |
Ana Francisca Ramirez | Hemato Oncologos S.A. | 1 |
Eva Remenyik | Debreceni Egyetem OEC; Borgyogyaszati Klinika | 1 |
Zita Battyani | Kaposi Mor Teaching Hospital | 1 |
Sidika Kurul | Istanbul Uni of Medicine Faculty; Oncology Department | 1 |
Esther De Eusebio | Hospital General Universitario de Guadalajara; Servicio de Dermatologia | 1 |
Andres Garcia-Paolomo Perez | Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon; Servicio de Onc | 1 |
Javier Martin Broto | Hospital Universitario Son Espases; Servicio de Oncologia | 1 |
Guillermo Lopez Vivanco | Hospital de Cruces; Servicio de Oncologia | 1 |
Nada Babovic | Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia; Medical Oncology | 1 |
Geke Hospers | Academ Ziekenhuis Groningen; Medical Oncology | 1 |
Lajos Kemeny | Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem; Borgyogyaszati es Allergologiai Klinika | 1 |
Vassilis Georgoulias | Univ General Hosp Heraklion; Medical Oncology | 1 |
Konstantinos Paparzisis | Euromedical General Clinic of Thessaloniki; Oncology Department | 1 |
Helen Gogas | Laiko General Hospital; 1st Pathological Clinic | 1 |
Hans-Robert Metelmann | Universitätsmedizin Greifswald; Klinik für MKG-Chirurgie und Plastische Operationen | 1 |
Rüdiger Hein | Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München; Klinik & Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie | 1 |
Maja Banjin | Clinic of Oncology – Clinical Center University of Sarajevo | 1 |
Harald Gollnick | Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg Klinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie | 1 |
Friedegund Meier | Universitätsklinikum ‘Carl Gustav Carus’; Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie | 1 |
Annette Stein | Universitätsklinikum ‘Carl Gustav Carus’; Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie | 1 |
Mark Berneburg | Universitätsklinikum Regensburg; Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie | 1 |
Edgar Dippel | Klinikum d.Stadt Ludwigshafen Hautklinik | 1 |
Jiri Horazdovsky | Nemocnice Ceske Budejovice | 0 |
Appendix 2. List of ethics committees/institutional review boards
Tabled
1
Country | Ethics committee/institutional review board |
---|---|
Argentina | Comite de Docencia e Investigacion del Roffo Av. San martin 5481 C1417DTB Buenos Aires |
Australia | Bellberry Human Research Ethics Committee Bellberry Limited 229 Greenhill Road 5065 Dulwich |
Austria | Ethikkommission d. Landes Niederösterreich Landhausplatz 1 3109 St. Pölten |
Austria | Ethikommission des Land Salzburg Sebastian-Stief-Gasse 2 5010 Salzburg |
Austria | EK Graz Med. Fakultaet Universitaet Graz 8036 Graz |
Austria | Ethikkommission der Universität Wien /AKH Borschkegasse 8b/E 06 1090 Wien |
Belgium | UZ Leuven – Ethisch comite Herestraat, 49 3000 Leuven |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | EC Clinical Center University of Sarajevo Bolnicka 25 71 000 Sarajevo |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | EC Clinical Center Banja Luka Dvanaest beba bb 78 000 Banja Luka |
Brazil | CEP para Analise de Projetos de Pesquisa do HCFMUSP e da FMUSP;Hospital da Universidade de São Paulo Rua Doutor Arnaldo, 455–01246-903 05403-010 São Paulo |
Brazil | CEP da Fundacao Pio XII – Hospital de Cancer de Barretos Rua Antenor Duarte Vilela 1331 14784-400 Barretos |
Brazil | Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350 90035-003 Porto Alegre |
Bulgaria | Local Ethics Committee Specialized Hospital For Active Treatment in Oncology 6 Plovdivsko pole Street 1756 Sofia |
Bulgaria | Local Ethics Committee Complex Oncology Center – Plovdiv 2A, Alexander Stamboliisky Str 4004 Plovdiv |
Canada | Quorum Review IRB 1501 Fourth Ave. Suite 800 98101 Seattle |
Canada | Health Research Ethics Board University of Alberta 308 Campus Tower 8625-112 Street T6G 1K8 Edmonton |
Canada | University of Western Ontario Office of Research Ethics Support Services Building, 1393 Western Road N6A 3K7 London |
Canada | Biomedical Research Ethics Board Univeristy Of Manitoba – Faculty Of Medicine P126 R3E 0W3 Winnipeg |
Colombia | Comité de Etica CAYRE Carrera 12 No. 98-38 Bogotá |
Colombia | Comité de Ética en Investigación del Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia Empresa social del Estado Bogotá |
Colombia | Comité de Investigaciones y ética en Investigaciones CALLE 78 B NO. 69-240 0 MEDELLIN |
Colombia | CREIMED. Comite de Estudios Medicos S.A.S Carrera 43 A # 34 – 155 Piso 6 Medellin |
Colombia | Comité de Etica en Investigacion IDYCIC SAS Carrera 21 # 14 – 80 Casa G 8 Chia |
Croatia | Central Ethics Committee Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, Ksaverska cesta 4 10000 Zagreb |
Czech Republic | Eticka Komise Vseobecne fakultni nemocnice Na Bojisti 1 128 08 Praha 2 |
Czech Republic | Etická komise pri IKEM a TN Vídenská 800 14059 Prague |
Czech Republic | Etická komise FNKV Šrobárova 50 100 34 Prague 10 |
Czech Republic | Eticka komise Nemocnice Ceske Budejovice B. Nemcove 54 37087 Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic |
Czech Republic | Eticka komise Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava 17 Listopadu 1790 70852 Ostrava |
Denmark | VEK København-Frederiksberg Regionsgården Kongens Vænge 2 DK-3400 Hillerød |
Finland | HUS Medisiininen eettinen toimikunta Biomedicum Helsinki 2 C, PL 705 Tukholmankatu 8 C 00029 Hus FINLAND |
France | CPP Ile de France VI Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpétrière – 4 Bat. de la Force 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital 75651 Paris France |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Schwanenweg 20 24105 Kiel |
Germany | EK an der Med. Fakultät d. Eberhard-Karls-Uni und am Uniklinikum Tübingen Gartenstr. 47 72074 Tübingen |
Germany | EK Essen Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen Robert-Koch-Str. 9-11, 2. Stock 45147 Essen |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1 30625 Hannover |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission Berlin Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales Fehrbelliner Platz 1 10707 Berlin |
Germany | Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät, der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Pettenkoferstr. 8a 80336 Muenchen |
Germany | EK Würzburg Versbacher Str. 9 97078 Würzburg |
Germany | EK Mannheim Maybachstr. 14 68169 Mannheim |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission der Landesärztekammer Thüringen Im Semmicht 33 07751 Jena |
Germany | EK Baden-Württemberg LÄK Jahnstr. 40 70597 Stuttgart |
Germany | EK Koeln Kerpener Str. 62 Gebäude 5 50937 Köln |
Germany | EK des Fachbereichs Medizin der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Uni Frankfurt Theodor-Stern-Kai 7 60596 Frankfurt |
Germany | EK Bayern LAK Muhlbaurstr. 16 81677 Munchen |
Germany | Kommission für Ethik in der ärztlichen Forschung des Fachbereichs Humanmedizin Baldingerstraße 35033 Marburg |
Germany | Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät Heidelberg Alte Glockengießerei 11/1 69115 Heidelberg |
Germany | EK Rheinland-Pfalz LÄK Deutschhausplatz 3 55116 Mainz |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission an der Universität Regensburg Franz-Josef-Strauß Allee 11 93053 Regensburg |
Germany | EK bei der Ärztekammer Niedersachsen Berliner Allee 20 30175 Hannover |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission am Universitätsklinikum Carl-Gustav-Carus Technische Universität Dresden Fiedlerstr. 27 01307 Dresden |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission der Landesärztekammer Thüringen Im Semmicht 33 07751 Jena |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Moorenstr. 5 40225 Düsseldorf |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität an der Medizinischen Fakultät Leipziger Straße 44 39120 Magdeburg |
Germany | EK München TU Ismaninger Str. 22 81675 München |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission der Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe u. der Med. Fakultät d. Westf. Wilhelms-Universität Gartenstr. 210 – 214 48147 Münster |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt Kühnauer Str. 70 06846 Dessau-Roßlau |
Germany | EK Lübeck Ratzeburger Allee 160 23538 Lübeck |
Germany | Ethikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 3 17487 Greifswald |
Germany | Ethik-Kommission Berlin Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales Fehrbelliner Platz 1 10707 Berlin |
Greece | National Ethics Committee Ministry of Health and Social Welfare 284, Messogion Avenue 15562 Cholargos Greece |
Hungary | Medical Research Council, Ethics Committee for Clinical Pharmacology Arany J. u. 6-8. 1051 Budapest Hungary |
Ireland | St Vincent's University Hospital Ethics Committee St Vincent's University Hospital Elm Park Dublin 4 Ireland |
Israel | Chaim Sheba Medical Center Ethics Committee Sheba M.C,Tel Hashomer 52621 Ramat-Gan Israel |
Israel | Helsinki Committee – Rambam Rambam Health Care Campus, POB 9602 31096 Haifa Israel |
Israel | Rabin Medical Center Ethics Committee Beilinson Campus 49372 Petah Tikva Israel |
Italy | CEI INT – Fondazione G. Pascale di Napoli VIA M. SEMMOLA 1 80131 Napoli |
Italy | Comitato Etico Irccs Istituto Clinico Humanitas Via Manzoni, 56 20089 Rozzano |
Italy | Irccs Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia (IEO); Comitato Etico VIA RIPAMONTI 435 20141 Milano |
Italy | Ce Indip. Presso la fond. Ptv Policl. Tor Vergata Viale Oxford, 81 00133 Roma |
Italy | CE Dell'IRCCS Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri Di Roma VIA ELIO CHIANESI 53 00144 Roma |
Italy | Comitato Etico Della Asl 1 Avezzano-Sulmona-L'aquila Presidio Ospedaliero L''aquila, Loc.Vetoio, Coppito 67100 L'AQUILA |
Italy | CEI Ist. Naz. per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori VIA VENEZIAN 1 20133 MILANO |
Italy | Comitato Etico Di Area Vasta Romagna E Irst Via Piero Maroncelli 40 47014 Meldola |
Italy | Comitato Etico Az Universitaria-Ospedaliera Senese via Bracci, 1 Centro Didattico Le Scotte 53100 Siena |
Italy | CE IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Per La Ricerca Sul Cancro (IST) LARGO ROSANNA BENZI 10 16132 GENOVA |
Italy | Comitato Etico Az. Sanitaria di Firenze Viale Michelangelo, 41 50125 Firenze |
Italy | Comitato Etico Azienda Spedali Civili di Brescia P.zza Spedali Civili, 1 25123 Brescia |
Italy | Comitato Etico Dell'Istituto Oncologico Veneto VIA Gattamelata, 64 35128 Padova |
Italy | CE Az.Sanitaria Ospedal. S.Luigi Gonzaga-Orbassano Via Regione Gonzole, 10 10043 Orbassano |
Italy | CE Dell'IRCCS Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri Di Roma VIA ELIO CHIANESI 53 00144 ROMA |
Italy | Ce Indip Di Etica Medica Della Asl Br Di Brindisi Via Napoli, 8 72100 Brindisi |
Italy | Comitato Etico Della Asl Di Cagliari Via Tigellio, 21 09127 Cagliari |
Italy | Comitato etico – Az. Policlinico Umberto I – Roma Viale Policlinico, 155 00161 Roma |
Italy | Comitato Etico-Scientifico Dell'Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda Di Milano Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milano |
Italy | Comitato Etico del Policlinico S.Orsola Malpighi Viale Albertoni, 15 40138 Bologna |
Lithuania | Lietuvos Bioetikos Komitetas Didzioji str. 22 LT-01128 Vilnius Lithuania |
Netherlands | Medisch ethische commissie AZM P. Debyelaan 25 6229 HX Maastricht Netherlands |
New Zealand | Northern A HDEC; Ministry of Health No.1 The Terrace PO BOX 5013 6011 Wellington New Zealand |
Norway | REK sør-øst Posboks 1130. Blindern 0318 Oslo |
Poland | Komisja Bioetyki ds. badan na ludziach ul. Zeligowskiego 7/9 90-752 Lodz Poland |
Portugal | CEIC – Comissão de Ética para Investigação Clínica Av. do Brasil, 53 – Pav 17-A ,Parque da Saúde de Lisboa 1749-004 Lisboa Portugal |
Romania | Comisia Nationala de Etica Str. Aviator Sanatescu, Nr. 48 Sector 1 011478 Bucharest Romania |
Russian Federation | City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, SPb SBIH CCOD EC/IRB 56, Prospekt Veteranov 198255 Saint-Petersburg Russian Federation |
Serbia | Ethics Committee of Institute of Oncol.& Radiology Pasterova 14 11000 Belgrade |
Serbia | Military Medical Academy; Ethics Committee of Military Medical Academy Crnotravska 17 11000 Belgrade |
Slovakia | Eticka komisia FNsP FDR Banska Bystrica Nam. L.Svobodu 1 975 17 Banska Bystrica Slovakia |
Slovenia | Komisija Republike Slovenije za Medicinsko Etiko Zaloska cesta 7 1525 Ljubljana |
Spain | CEIC Hospital General Universitario de Valencia Avda. Tres Cruces s/n 46014 Valencia |
Spain | CEIC Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre HOSPITAL MATERNO INFANTIL Avda. de Córdoba, s/n 28041 Madrid |
Spain | CEIC del Hospital Virgen de las Nieves C/ Dr. Azpitarte, nº 4, 4ª planta 18012 Granada |
Spain | CEIC Virgen Macarena Avenue Dr. Fedriani 3 – Investigation Department 2nd Floor 41071 Sevilla |
Spain | CEIC del Hospital Gregorio Marañón C/ Doctor Esquerdo, 46 Oficina Técnica Secretaria CEIC-A1 Pabellón de Gobierno 28007 Madrid |
Spain | Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica de La Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (CEIC-E) Dirección de Farmacia C/ Donostia-San Sebastián, 1 01010 Vitoria |
Spain | CEIC Area de Salud de Leon Altos De Nava S/N 24071 Leon |
Spain | Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica del Hospital Universitario de Gran Canarias Dr. Negrín 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria |
Spain | Comité Etico de Investigación Clínica Hospital Clinic i Provincial Agencia de Ensayos Clínicos (sótano, escalera 8) 08036 Barcelona |
Spain | Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía Edificio Consultas Externas, planta -1 (sótano) 14004 Cordoba |
Spain | CEIC Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Secretaría del CEIC C/ Profesor Beltrán Báguena, 8 6009 Valencia |
Spain | Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica Hospital Virgen de la Salud Avda Barber 30 45004 Toledo |
Spain | Comité Etico de Investigación Clínica |
Recinto Hospital de Navarra Centro de Investigación Biomédica 31008 Pamplona Spain | |
Spain | CEIC Ntra. Sra. de Candelaria Road Del Rosario, 145 3rd Floor 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife |
Spain | CEIC del Hospital de Asturias C/Celestino Villamil, s/n Centro de Rehabilitación 5ª planta 33006 Asturias |
Spain | CEIC del Hospital Gregorio Marañón C/ Doctor Esquerdo, 46 Oficina Técnica Secretaria CEIC-A1 Pabellón de Gobierno 28007 Madrid |
Spain | Comité Ético de Ensayos Clínicos del Hospital Univ Crtra. Madrid-Cartagena s/n 30120 Murcia |
Spain | Comité Etico de Investigación Clínica Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Farmacología Clínica 08025 Barcelona |
Spain | Comité Etico de Investigación Clinica de las Islas Baleares Servicio Balear de Salud (SERBASA) 07003 Palma de Mallorca |
Spain | CEIC de la Fundación Hospital de Alcorcón C/ Budapest, 1 28922 Alcorcón |
Spain | Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica de Aragón Avda Gómez Laguna 25 50009 Zaragoza |
Spain | Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica del Hospital General de Guadalajara Donantes de sangre, s/n 19002 Guadalajara |
Sweden | Regionala Etikprövningsnämnden i Stockholm Box 289 Karolinska Institute, Nobelsväg 12A 171 77 Stockholm Sweden |
Switzerland | Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich (KEK) Stampfenbachstrasse 121 |
8091 Zürich Switzerland | |
Turkey | Istanbul Universitesi Istanbul Tip Fakultesi Klinik Arastirmalar Etik Kurulu Istanbul University Istanbul Tip Fakultesi Ethics Committee 34390 Istanbul Turkey |
United Kingdom | East of England – Cambridge East The Old Chapel Royal Standard Court NG1 6FS Nottingham United Kingdom |
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the supplementary data related to this article:
References
- Advanced basal cell carcinoma: epidemiology and therapeutic innovations.Curr Dermatol Rep. 2014; 3: 40-45
- Basal-cell carcinoma.N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 2262-2269
- Challenges and new horizons in the management of advanced basal cell carcinoma: a UK perspective.Br J Cancer. 2014; 111: 1476-1481
- Identifying locally advanced basal cell carcinoma eligible for treatment with vismodegib: an expert panel consensus.Future Oncol. 2015; 11: 703-712
- Basal cell carcinomas: attack of the hedgehog.Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8: 743-754
- Vismodegib. Approved drugs.January 2012 ([Accessed 3 March 2017])
- Erivedge. European public assessment report.July 2013 ([Accessed 3 March 2017])
- Efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced basal-cell carcinoma.N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 2171-2179
- Pivotal ERIVANCE basal cell carcinoma (BCC) study: 12-month update of efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced BCC.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72 (1021–26.e8)
- Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: final update (30-month) of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC Study.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2014; 32 (abstr 9013)
- Vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (STEVIE): a pre-planned interim analysis of an international, open-label trial.Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: 729-736
- Determination of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the first 285 patients enrolled in the RegiSONIC disease registry study.J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33 (abstr 9022)
- Metastatic basal cell carcinoma: prognosis dependent on anatomic site and spread of disease.Eur J Cancer. 2014; 50: 774-783
- The 12-month analysis from basal cell carcinoma outcomes with LDE225 treatment (BOLT): a phase II, randomized, double-blind study of sonidegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 75: 113-125
- New onset of keratoacanthomas after vismodegib treatment for locally advanced basal cell carcinomas: a report of 2 cases.JAMA Dermatol. 2013; 149: 242-243
- Increased risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma after vismodegib therapy for basal cell carcinoma.JAMA Dermatol. 2016; 152: 527-532
- Risk of developing a subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer: a critical review of the literature and meta-analysis.Arch Dermatol. 2000; 136: 1524-1530
- Risk of subsequent cutaneous malignancy in patients with prior keratinocyte carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Cancer. 2013; 49: 2365-2375
- Persistent alopecia induced by vismodegib.Br J Dermatol. 2015; 172: 1671-1672
- Erivedge (vismodegib) [prescribing information]. Genentech, Inc., SouthSan Francisco, CA2015
- Erivedge (vismodegib) [summary of product characteristics]. Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK2016
- Characterization and management of hedgehog pathway inhibitor-related adverse events in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma.Oncologist. 2016; 21: 1218-1229
- Managing adverse events associated with vismodegib in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma.Future Oncol. 2017; 13: 175-184
Article info
Publication history
Published online: October 24, 2017
Accepted:
August 28,
2017
Received in revised form:
July 4,
2017
Received:
May 12,
2017
Footnotes
☆Prior presentations: The primary analysis from the STEVIE study was presented in part at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 3–7, 2016, Chicago, IL, USA.
Identification
Copyright
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | How you can reuse
Elsevier's open access license policy

Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy