Highlights
- •Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the single most effective treatment for menopause-related symptoms.
- •Its use declined after 2002 because of a reported elevated breast cancer risk. Little is known on the overall cancer risk or other cancer types.
- •This contemporary MHT study showed a 9% increased cancer risk, with a decreased risk of all gastrointestinal cancer.
- •The cancer risk was more limited than expected, with variations for MHT types, formulations and regimens.
Abstract
Aim
We aimed to assess the overall cancer risk among contemporary menopausal hormone therapy
(MHT) users in Sweden and the risk for different cancer types.
Methods
A nationwide Swedish population-based cohort study including all 290,186 women aged
≥ 40 years having used systemic MHT during the study period (July 2005 and December
2012), compared with the Swedish female background population. MHT ever-use (all MHT,
oestrogen-only MHT [E-MHT] and oestrogen plus progestin MHT [EP-MHT]) was based on
the nationwide Prescribed Drug Registry. Cancer diagnoses were grouped into 16 different
anatomical locations, for which standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence
intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results
The SIR of any cancer was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.07–1.11) following ever MHT, 1.04 (95% CI:
1.01–1.06) for E-MHT and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.12–1.17) for EP-MHT. The highest SIR was
found for EP-MHT among users aged ≥70 years (SIR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.26–1.40). The risk
for invasive breast, endometrial or ovarian cancer combined was increased for any
MHT (SIR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.28–1.34). The risk of invasive breast cancer was increased
following MHT and increased with age for EP-MHT users. The risk of gastrointestinal
cancers combined was decreased (SIR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86–0.94), particularly the oesophagus
(SIR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.64–1.00), liver (SIR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65–0.99) and colon (SIR = 0.90,
95% CI: 0.84–0.95).
Conclusions
MHT, notably EP-MHT, was associated with a limited increase in overall cancer risk.
The increased risk of female reproductive organ cancers was almost balanced by a decreased
risk of gastrointestinal cancers.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of CancerAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The Swedish medical products agency (Läkemedelsverket). 2017
- Menopausal hormone therapy use in 17 European countries during the last decade.Maturitas. 2014; 79: 287-291
- Important factors for use of hormone replacement therapy: a population-based study of Swedish women. The Women's Health in Lund Area (WHILA) Study.Menopause. 2000; 7: 273-281
- A longitudinal population study of climacteric symptoms and their treatment in a random sample of Swedish women.Climacteric. 2004; 7: 357-365
- Risks and benefits of oestrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2002; 288: 321-333
- Hormone replacement therapy, cancer, controversies, and women's health: historical, epidemiological, biological, clinical, and advocacy perspectives.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59: 740-748
- Hormone-replacement therapy: current thinking.Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017; 13: 220-231https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.164
- Menopause management–getting clinical care back on track.N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 803-806
- Characteristics and recent evolution of menopausal hormone therapy use in a cohort of Swedish women.Climacteric. 2009; 12: 410-418
- Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials.Hum Reprod Update. 2005; 11: 561-573
- Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies.Lancet. 2015; 385: 1835-1842
- Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: scientific review.JAMA. 2002; 288: 872-881
- Menopausal hormone therapy and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer.Int J Cancer. 2017; 140 ([Epub 2017 Jan 6]): 1693-1699https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30588
- Hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives and risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Cancer. 2014; 135: 2183-2190
- Hormonal and reproductive factors and risk of esophageal cancer in women: a meta-analysis.Dis Esophagus. 2016; 29: 448-454
- Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of gastrointestinal cancer: nested case-control study within a prospective cohort, and meta-analysis.Int J Cancer. 2012; 130: 2387-2396
- The effect of oestrogen vs. combined oestrogen-progestogen therapy on the risk of colorectal cancer.Int J Cancer. 2012; 130: 419-430
- Menopausal hormone therapy and pancreatic cancer risk in women.UEG. 2017; (In press)https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640617702060
- Hormone replacement therapy in females can decrease the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2013; 8: e71236
- Significant reduction of antibiotic consumption and patients' costs after an action plan in China, 2010–2014.PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0118868
- Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of lung cancer-systematic review and meta-analysis.Maturitas. 2010; 65: 198-204
- Hormonal and reproductive factors in relation to melanoma in women: current review and meta-analysis.Eur J Cancer. 2011; 47: 2607-2617
- Menstrual and reproductive history and use of exogenous sex hormones and risk of thyroid cancer among women: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.Cancer Causes Control. 2015; 26: 511-518
- Hormone replacement therapy, likely neither angel nor demon.PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0138556
- The new Swedish prescribed drug register–opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007; 16: 726-735
- The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998.Acta Oncol. 2009; 48: 27-33
- Comparing hospital discharge records with death certificates: can the differences be explained?.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56: 301-308
- Cancer statistics, 2013.CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63: 11-30
Socialstyrelsen. Cancerincidence i Sverige 2014. Socialstyrelsen, december 2015; 2015. Report No.: 2014-12-26.
- Statistical methods in cancer research.International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon, 1987
- Hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms: putting benefits and risks into perspective.J Fam Pract. 2010; 59: E1-E7
- Postmenopausal hormone therapy: an Endocrine Society scientific statement.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95: s1-s66
- Hormone replacement therapy.BMJ. 2012; 344: e763
- Revised global consensus statement on menopausal hormone therapy.Climacteric. 2016; 19: 313-315
- Vaginala vägen vinner vid hysterektomi.Läkartidningen. 2007; 104: 2167-2169
- Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987–2003: a nationwide trend analysis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88: 52-58
- Declining breast cancer incidence and decreased HRT use.Lancet. 2008; 372: 608-610
Li C, Samsioe G Fau, Lidfelt J, Lidfelt J Fau - Nerbrand C, Nerbrand C Fau - Agardh CD, Agardh CD. Important factors for use of hormone replacement therapy: a population-based study of Swedish women. The Women's Health in Lund Area (WHILA) Study. (1072–3714 (Print)).
- Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1091-1095
- Use of hormone therapy in Swedish women aged 80 years or older.Menopause. 2015; 22: 275-278
- Menopausal symptoms in older women and the effects of treatment with hormone therapy.Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100: 1209-1218
- Menopausal hormone therapy and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer.Int J Cancer. 2017; 140: 1693-1699
- What proportion of cancer deaths in the contemporary United States is attributable to cigarette smoking?.Ann Epidemiol. 2015; 25: 179-182 e1
- 2. Tobacco-attributable cancer burden in the UK in 2010.Br J Cancer. 2011; 105: S6-S13
Article info
Publication history
Published online: August 04, 2017
Accepted:
July 11,
2017
Received in revised form:
July 5,
2017
Received:
May 12,
2017
Identification
Copyright
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
