Advertisement
Clinical Trial| Volume 60, P69-82, June 2016

Download started.

Ok

Outcome of extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumours in children registered in the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma 2005 Study—EpSSG NRSTS 2005

Published:April 12, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.027

      Highlights

      • This is the first prospective international study of extracranial MRT in children.
      • This study shows that intensive therapy can be delivered to a very young population of MRTs, with an improvement in outcome.
      • Age less than 1 year, metastatic disease and progression on treatment lead to a dismal outcome.
      • This evidence allows us to use this protocol as a standard chemotherapy backbone, for future studies with new agents.
      • It is unlikely we will improve the outcome with current chemotherapy which is already at maximal tolerance.

      Abstract

      Background

      Extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumours (MRT) are rare lethal childhood cancers that often occur in infants and have a characteristic genetic mutation in the SMARCB1 gene. The European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) conducted a multinational prospective study of registered cases of extracranial MRT to test an intensive multimodal approach of treatment for children with newly diagnosed extracranial MRT.

      Methods

      Between December 2005 and June 2014, we prospectively registered 100 patients from 12 countries with a diagnosis of MRT tumour at an extracranial site on the EpSSG Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma 2005 Study (NRSTS 2005). They were all treated on a standard multimodal protocol of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy over 30 weeks as follows: vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (VDCy) at weeks 1, 10, 13, 22, and 28; vincristine was also given alone on weeks 2, 3, 11, 12, 14, 15, 23, 24, 29, and 30. Cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (Cy*CE) was given at weeks 4, 7, 16, 19, and 25. Radiotherapy was recommended for all primary tumour sites and all sites of metastatic disease.

      Results

      Forty-three patients completed the protocol treatment. Median follow-up for alive patients of the complete cohort was 44.6 months (range 11.5–84.6). For the whole cohort, the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 32.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.2–41.6%) with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 38.4% (95% CI 28.8–47.9%). For localised disease, the 4-year EFS was 39.3% (95% CI 28.2–50.1%) with a 4-year OS of 40.1% (95% CI 28.4–51.5%). For metastatic disease, the 2-year EFS was 8.7% (95% CI 1.5–24.2%) with a 2-year OS of 13.0% (95% CI 3.3–29.7%). Multivariable analysis disclosed that all patients ≤1 year of age were associated with at higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.6; 95% CI 1.0–6.8; p-value = 0.0094). Risk of death was also related with gender in metastatic patients (HR for males: 2.9, 95% CI 1.0–8.0; p-value = 0.0077).

      Conclusions

      The EpSSG NRSTS 2005 protocol of intensive therapy can be delivered to extracranial MRT patients, with a possible improvement in outcome. The outcome, however, remains poor for patients who progress or with metastatic disease.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Stiller C. Childhood cancer in Britain: incidence, survival, mortality. Oxford University Press, Oxford2007
        • Brennan B.M.D.
        • Stiller C.
        • Bourdeaut F.
        Extracranial rhabdoid tumours: what we have learned so far and future directions.
        Lancet Oncology. 2013; 14: 329-336
        • Tomlinson G.E.
        • Breslow N.E.
        • Dome J.
        • Adams Guthrie K.
        • Norkool P.
        • Li S.
        • et al.
        Rhabdoid tumor of the kidney in the National Wilms’ Tumor Study: age at diagnosis as a prognostic factor.
        Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005; 23: 7641-7645
        • Sultan I.
        • Qaddoumi I.
        • Rodríguez-Galindo C.
        • Al Nassan A.
        • Ghandour K.
        • Al-Hussaini M.
        Age, stage, and radiotherapy, but not primary tumor site, affects the outcome of patients with malignant rhabdoid tumors.
        Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010; 54: 35-40
        • Bourdeaut F.
        • Fréneaux P.
        • Thuille B.
        • Bergeron C.
        • Laurence V.
        • Brugières L.
        • et al.
        Extra-renal non-cerebral rhabdoid tumours.
        Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008; 51: 363-368
        • Waldron P.E.
        • Rodgers B.M.
        • Kelly M.D.
        • Wormer R.B.
        Successful treatment of a patient with stage IV rhabdoid tumor of the kidney:case report and review.
        J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1999; 21: 53-57
        • Wagner L.
        • Hill D.A.
        • Fuller C.
        • Pedrosa M.
        • Bhakta M.
        • Perry A.
        • et al.
        Treatment of metastatic rhabdoid tumor of the kidney.
        J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002; 24: 385-388
        • Maurer H.M.
        • Beltangady M.
        • Gehan E.A.
        • Crist W.
        • Hammond D.
        • Hays D.M.
        • et al.
        The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study I: a final report.
        Cancer. 1988; 61: 209-220
        • Womer R.B.
        • West D.C.
        • Krailo M.D.
        • Dickman P.S.
        • Pawel B.R.
        • Grier H.E.
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial of interval-compressed chemotherapy for the treatment of localized Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.
        J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20; 30: 4148-4154
        • Torchia J.
        • Picard D.
        • Lafay-Cousin L.
        • Hawkins C.E.
        • Kim S.K.
        • Letourneau L.
        • et al.
        Molecular subgroups of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours in children: an integrated genomic and clinicopathological analysis.
        Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: 569-582
        • Morgenstern D.A.
        • Gibson S.
        • Brown T.
        • Sebire N.J.
        • Anderson J.
        Clinical and pathological features of paediatric malignant rhabdoid tumours.
        Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010; : 29-34
        • Kordes U.
        • Bartelheim K.
        • Modena P.
        • Massimino M.
        • Biassoni V.
        • Reinhard H.
        • et al.
        Favorable outcome of patients affected by rhabdoid tumors due to rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS).
        Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014; 61: 919-921
        • Knutson S.K.
        • Warholic N.M.
        • Wigle T.J.
        • Klaus C.R.
        • Allain C.J.
        • Raimondi A.
        • et al.
        Durable tumor regression in genetically altered malignant rhabdoid tumors by inhibition of methyltransferase EZH2.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110: 7922-7927
        • Lin D.
        • Wei L.J.
        • Ying Z.
        Checking the cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals.
        Biometrika. 1993; 80: 557-572