Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 51, ISSUE 4, P558-568, March 2015

Download started.

Ok

Cancer incidence in participants in a long-distance ski race (Vasaloppet, Sweden) compared to the background population

Published:February 07, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.009

      Abstract

      Background

      We studied the association between taking part in a long distance ski race and cancer incidence to address the hypothesis that a lifestyle involving a high degree of physical activity (PA) lowers cancer incidence with a pattern that is different by cancer site.

      Methods

      Cancer incidence was estimated in a large cohort of skiers (n = 185,412) participating in the Vasaloppet long distance ski race in Sweden 1989–2010 and non-participants in the ski race, randomly selected from the Swedish general population (n = 184,617). Data include race finishing times as a measurement of physical fitness.
      Hazard ratios (HRs) and net probability of cancer over twenty years of follow-up were estimated for all invasive cancer, and separately for prostate, breast, colo-rectal and lung cancer, and groups of cancers with presumed relation to lifestyle.

      Findings

      Participating in Vasaloppet was associated with a relative risk reduction for all invasive cancer of 6% (95% confidence interval 2–9%) and a relative risk reduction of 32% (95% confidence interval 28–37%) of cancer sites where there is epidemiological evidence that smoking, bodyweight, regular PA and consumption of fruit and vegetables are aetiological factors. For skin cancer the risk was increased, as for prostate cancer. Skiers with shorter finishing times had lower incidence of cancer.

      Interpretation

      This study indicates that it is unrealistic to reduce overall population cancer incidence drastically with life style. However, cancers that are epidemiologically associated with life style factors were significantly reduced by what presumably is a blend of non-smoking, normal body weight, sound dietary habits and PA. Our data thus provide additional support for present days’ recommendations about life style prevention. Higher health awareness is associated with attendance to screening, which may explain our results for prostate cancer.

      Funding

      University fund, independent funds from an insurance company and a private foundation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Danaei G.
        • et al.
        Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors.
        Lancet. 2005; 366: 1784-1793
        • Fund W.C.R.
        Food, nutrition, physical activity and prevention of cancer: a global perspective.
        World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute of Cancer Research, Washington, DC2007
        • Wiseman M.
        The second World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research expert report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective.
        Proc Nutr Soc. 2008; 67: 253-256
      1. Cancer, E.E.P.I.A.A. The “11 commandments” for cancer prevention. 2013; Available from: <http://www.epaac.eu/health-promotion-and-prevention>.

      2. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee report, 2008. To the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Part A: executive summary.
        Nutr Rev. 2009; 67: 114-120
      3. AICR, W. Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective; 2007.

        • IARC
        Weight control and physical activity, vol 6. IARC. Lyon, in IARC handbook of cancer prevention.
        IARC, Lyon2002
        • Charlson M.E.
        • et al.
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383
      4. Projekt, E. Research activities. Cancer sites. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. Available from: <http://epic.iarc.fr/research/cancer.php>.

        • Team R.C.
        R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
        Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria2013
      5. Bergh, U., Cross-Country Ski Racing in Endurance in Sport., in Oxford Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. 1992, The Encyclopedia of sports medicine: an international Olympic Committee publication. In collaboration with the International Federation of Sports. p. 570–81.

        • Carlsson S.
        • et al.
        Skiers in the long-distance ski race invest in their health.
        Läkartidningen. 2007; 104: 670-671
        • Paffenbarger Jr., R.S.
        • et al.
        Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni.
        N Engl J Med. 1986; 314: 605-613
        • van Saase J.L.
        • Noteboom W.M.
        • Vandenbroucke J.P.
        Longevity of men capable of prolonged vigorous physical exercise: a 32 year follow up of 2259 participants in the Dutch eleven cities ice skating tour.
        BMJ. 1990; 301: 1409-1411
        • Farahmand B.Y.
        • et al.
        Mortality amongst participants in Vasaloppet: a classical long-distance ski race in Sweden.
        J Intern Med. 2003; 253: 276-283
        • Romaguera D.
        • et al.
        Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? Results from the EPIC study.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 96: 150-163
        • Bratt O.
        • et al.
        Effects of prostate-specific antigen testing on familial prostate cancer risk estimates.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102: 1336-1343
        • Marmot M.A.D.
        • Cameron D.A.
        • Dewer J.A.
        • Thompson S.G.
        • Wilcox M.
        The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 1778-1786
      6. MF, L., Physical activity and genitourinary cancer prevention. Physical activity and cancer: Recent results in cancer research, vol 186, ed. F.C. Courneya KS. Vol. 186. 2011, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

        • Lynch B.M.
        • Neilson H.K.
        • Friedenreich C.M.
        Physical activity and breast cancer prevention.
        Recent Results Cancer Res. 2011; 186: 13-42
      7. Emaus A, T.I., Physical activity and lung cancer prevention. Physical activity and cancer; recent results in cancer research vol. 186, ed. F.C. Courneya KS. 2011: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

      8. Hardman EA, S.D., Physical activity and Health, Chap 8 Cancer, Second edition 2009 Routledge 165–183, 2009, USA and Canada.

        • Martinez M.E.
        • et al.
        Leisure-time physical activity, body size, and colon cancer in women. Nurses’ Health Study Research Group.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 948-955
        • Wolin K.Y.
        • Tuchman H.
        Physical activity and gastrointestinal cancer prevention.
        in: Physical activity and cancer; Resent results in cancer research. Berlin Heidelberg Springer, 2011