Advertisement

Multiple tumours in survival estimates

Published:January 05, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.030

      Abstract

      In international comparisons of cancer registry based survival it is common practice to restrict the analysis to first primary tumours and exclude multiple cancers. The probability of correctly detecting subsequent cancers depends on the registry’s running time, which results in different proportions of excluded patients and may lead to biased comparisons. We evaluated the impact on the age-standardised relative survival estimates of also including multiple primary tumours.
      Data from 2,919,023 malignant cancers from 69 European cancer registries participating in the EUROCARE-4 collaborative study were used. A total of 183,683 multiple primary tumours were found, with an overall proportion of 6.3% over all the considered cancers, ranging from 0.4% (Naples, Italy) to 12.9% (Iceland). The proportion of multiple tumours varied greatly by type of tumour, being higher for those with high incidence and long survival (breast, prostate and colon-rectum). Five-year relative survival was lower when including patients with multiple cancers. For all cancers combined the average difference was –0.4 percentage points in women and –0.7 percentage points in men, and was greater for older registries. Inclusion of multiple tumours led to lower survival in 44 out of 45 cancer sites analysed, with the greatest differences found for larynx (–1.9%), oropharynx (–1.5%), and penis (–1.3%).
      Including multiple primary tumours in survival estimates for international comparison is advisable because it reduces the bias due to different observation periods, age, registration quality and completeness of registration. The general effect of inclusion is to reduce survival estimates by a variable amount depending on the proportion of multiple primaries and cancer site.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Berrino F.
        • DeAngelis R.
        • Sant M.
        • et al.
        Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995–99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8: 773-783
      1. National Cancer Institutes. SEER program coding and staging manual. Released May 15, 2007. Available at <http://seer.cancer.gov/tools/codingmanuals/> (accessed December 2007).

      2. IARC/IACR. International rules for multiple primary cancer (ICD-O Third edition). Internal Report no. 2004/02. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2004.

      3. Berrino F, Sant M, Verdecchia A, Capocaccia R, Hakulinen T, Estéve J. Survival of cancer patients in Europe. The EUROCARE Study. IARC Scientifics Publications Vol. 132. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1995.

      4. Ries L, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer statistics review, 1975–2003. November 2005 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2006, Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2006.

        • Brenner H.
        • Hakulinen T.
        Patients with previous cancer should not be excluded in international comparative cancer survival studies.
        Int J Cancer. 2007; 121: 2274-2278
      5. EUROCARE website: <http://www.eurocare.it/Scripts/Document.htm> (accessed December 2007).

        • De Angelis R.
        • Francisci S.
        • Baili P.
        • et al.
        • the EUROCARE Working Group
        The EUROCARE-4 database on cancer survival in Europe: Data standardisation, quality control and methods of statistical analysis.
        Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45: 909-930
        • Coleman M.P.
        • Gatta G.
        • Verdecchia A.
        • et al.
        EUROCARE-3 summary: cancer survival in Europe at the end of the 20th century.
        Ann Oncol. 2003; 14: 128-149
        • Hakulinen T.
        Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patients withdrawal.
        Biometrics. 1982; 38: 933-942
        • Corazziari I.
        • Quinn M.
        • Capocaccia R.
        Standard cancer patients population for age standardising survival ratios.
        Eur J Cancer. 2004; 40: 2307-2316
      6. SEER website: <http://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/>.

      7. Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, et al. (editors). New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000. NHI Publications 05-5302. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 2006.

      8. Blair RJ, Simonato L, Storm HH, Démaret E. Automated data collection in cancer registration. IARC Technical Publication Vol. 32, Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1998.

        • Brooks J.M.
        • Chriscilles E.
        • Scott S.
        • Ritho J.
        • Chen-Hardee S.
        Information gained from linking SEER Cancer Registry Data to state-level hospital discharge abstract. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.
        Med Care. 2000; 38: 1131-1140
        • Crocetti E.
        • Lecker S.
        • Buiatti E.
        • Storm H.H.
        Problems related to coding of multiple primary cancers.
        Eur J Cancer. 1996; 32A: 1366-1370