Research Article| Volume 42, ISSUE 12, P1817-1825, August 2006

Download started.


Establishing content validity of the oral assessment guide in children and young people


      There is a need for accurate and consistent oral assessment to measure mucosal changes and oral complications associated with cancer therapies. Mucositis is an important and common side effect of cancer therapies that merits the identification of improved health-care interventions. Developing appropriate and reliable oral assessment instruments for use with children is relevant to the evaluation of these interventions. The purpose of this study was to determine the content validity of the oral assessment guide (OAG) in children: an instrument that was designed to objectively assess the physiological changes of the oral cavity following administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy to adults. This process is considered to be most effective when undertaken systematically. A judgement quantification process was used with health care professionals in paediatric oncology to establish content validity of items (n = 9) and instrument (n = 10). A revised OAG more pertinent to children and young people was produced in the light of this process.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Eilers J.
        • Berger A.M.
        • Petersen M.C.
        Development, testing and application of the oral assessment guide.
        Oncol Nurs Forum. 1988; 15: 325-330
        • Gatta G.
        • Capocaccia R.
        • Coleman M.P.
        • Ries L.A.
        • Berrino F.
        Childhood cancer survival in Europe and the United States.
        Cancer. 2002; 95: 1767-1772
        • Trotti A.
        • Bellm L.A.
        • Epstein J.B.
        • Frame D.
        • Fuchs H.J.
        • Gwede C.K.
        • et al.
        Mucositis incidence, severity and associated outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: a systematic literature review.
        Radiother Oncol. 2003; 66: 253-262
        • Cheng K.K.
        • Molassiotis A.
        • Chang A.M.
        An oral care protocol intervention to prevent chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in paediatric cancer patients: a pilot study.
        Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2002; 6: 66-73
        • Carl W.
        Oral complications in cancer patients.
        Am Fam Physician. 1983; 27: 161-170
        • Woo S.B.
        • Sonis S.T.
        • Monopoli M.M.
        • Sonis A.L.
        A longitudinal study of oral ulcerative mucositis in bone marrow transplant recipients.
        Cancer. 1993; 72: 1612-1617
        • Fulton J.S.
        • Middleton G.J.
        • McPhail J.T.
        Management of oral complications.
        Semin Oncol Nurs. 2002; 18: 28-35
        • Armstrong T.S.
        Stomatitis in the bone marrow transplant patient. An overview and proposed oral care protocol.
        Cancer Nurs. 1994; 17: 403-410
        • Bonnaure-Mallet M.
        • Bunetel L.
        • Tricot-Doleux S.
        • Guerin J.
        • Bergeron C.
        • LeGall E.
        Oral complications during treatment of malignant diseases in childhood: effects of tooth brushing.
        Eur J Cancer. 1998; 34: 1588-1591
        • Childers N.K.
        • Stinnett E.A.
        • Wheeler P.
        • Wright J.T.
        • Castleberry R.P.
        • Dasanayake A.P.
        Oral complications in children with cancer.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993; 75: 41-47
        • Sonis A.
        • Sonis S.
        Oral complications of cancer chemotherapy in pediatric patients.
        J Pedod. 1979; 3: 122-128
        • Sonis S.T.
        • Eilers J.P.
        • Epstein J.B.
        • Leveque F.G.
        • Liggett Jr., W.H.
        • Mulagha M.T.
        • et al.
        Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Mucositis Study Group.
        Cancer. 1999; 85: 2103-2113
        • Sonis S.T.
        • Van Vugt A.G.
        • McDonald J.
        • Dotoli E.
        • Schwertschlag U.
        • Szklut P.
        • et al.
        Mitigating effects of interleukin 11 on consecutive courses of 5-fluorouracil-induced ulcerative mucositis in hamsters.
        Cytokine. 1997; 9: 605-612
        • Sonis S.T.
        Mucositis as a biological process: a new hypothesis for the development of chemotherapy-induced stomatotoxicity.
        Oral Oncol. 1998; 34: 39-43
        • Sonis S.T.
        • Van Vugt A.G.
        • Brien J.P.
        • Muska A.D.
        • Bruskin A.M.
        • Rose A.
        • et al.
        Transforming growth factor-beta 3 mediated modulation of cell cycling and attenuation of 5-fluorouracil induced oral mucositis.
        Oral Oncol. 1997; 33: 47-54
        • Uziely B.
        • Jeffers S.
        • Isacson R.
        • Kutsch K.
        • Wei-Tsao D.
        • Yehoshua Z.
        • et al.
        Liposomal doxorubicin: antitumor activity and unique toxicities during two complementary phase I studies.
        J Clin Oncol. 1995; 13: 1777-1785
        • Seiter K.
        • Kemeny N.
        • Martin D.
        • Schneider A.
        • Williams L.
        • Colofiore J.
        • et al.
        Uridine allows dose escalation of 5-fluorouracil when given with N-phosphonacetyl-l-aspartate, methotrexate, and leucovorin.
        Cancer. 1993; 71: 1875-1881
        • Parulekar W.
        • MacKenzie R.
        • Bjarnason G.
        • Jordan R.C.
        Scoring oral mucositis.
        Oral Oncol. 1998; 34: 63-71
        • Richardson A.
        A process standard for oral care.
        Nurs Times. 1987; 83: 38-40
      1. Beck S L. Prevention and management of oral complications in the cancer patient. In: Hubbard SM, Greene PE, Knobf MT, editors. Current issues in cancer nursing practice updates, vol. 1(6); 1992. p. 1–12.

        • Collins J.J.
        • Byrnes M.E.
        • Dunkel I.J.
        • Lapin J.
        • Nadel T.
        • Thaler H.T.
        • et al.
        The measurement of symptoms in children with cancer.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000; 19: 363-377
        • van der Rijt C.C.
        • van Zuijlen L.
        Studies on supportive care in oral mucositis: random or randomised?.
        Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37: 1971-1975
        • Gibson F.
        • Horsford J.
        • Nelson W.
        Mouthcare-ritualistic practice reconsidered within a framework of action research.
        J Cancer Nurs. 1997; 1: 183-190
        • Holmes S.
        Mountain E Assessment of oral status: evaluation of three oral assessment guides.
        J Clin Nurs. 1993; 2: 35-40
        • Zerbe M.B.
        • Parkerson S.G.
        • Ortlieb M.L.
        • Spitzer T.
        Relationships between oral mucositis and treatment variables in bone marrow transplant patients.
        Cancer Nurs. 1992; 15: 196-205
        • Nelson W.
        • Gibson F.
        • Hayden S.
        • Morgan N.
        Using action research in paediatric oncology to develop an oral care algorithm.
        Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2001; 5: 180-189
        • Andersson P.
        • Persson L.
        • Hallberg I.R.
        • Renvert S.
        Testing an oral assessment guide during chemotherapy treatment in a Swedish care setting: a pilot study.
        J Clin Nurs. 1999; 8: 150-158
        • Cheng K.K.
        • Molassiotis A.
        • Chang A.M.
        • Wai W.C.
        • Cheung S.S.
        Evaluation of an oral care protocol intervention in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in paediatric cancer patients.
        Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37: 2056-2063
        • Hymovich D.P.
        Measurement issues with children and adolescents.
        Instruments for clinical nursing research. Jones and Bartlett Publishers International, USA1997
        • Dodd M.J.
        • Facione N.C.
        • Dibble S.L.
        • MacPhail L.
        Comparison of methods to determine the prevalence and nature of oral mucositis.
        Cancer Pract. 1996; 4: 312-318
        • Maciejewski B.
        • Skladowski K.
        • Pilecki B.
        • Taylor J.M.
        • Withers R.H.
        • Miszczyk L.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial on accelerated 7 days per week fractionation in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Preliminary report on acute toxicity.
        Radiother Oncol. 1996; 40: 137-145
        • Tardieu C.
        • Cowen D.
        • Thirion X.
        • Franquin J.C.
        Quantitative scale of oral mucositis associated with autologous bone marrow transplantation.
        Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1996; 32B: 381-387
        • Donnelly J.P.
        • Muus P.
        • Schattenberg A.
        • de Witte T.
        • Horrevorts A.
        • DePauw B.E.
        A scheme for daily monitoring of oral mucositis in allogeneic BMT recipients.
        Bone Marrow Transplant. 1992; 9: 409-413
        • Lynn M.R.
        Determination and quantification of content validity.
        Nurs Res. 1986; 35: 382-385
        • Grant J.S.
        • Davis L.L.
        Selection and use of content experts for instrument development.
        Res Nurs Health. 1997; 20: 269-274
        • Berk R.A.
        Importance of expert judgment in content-related validity evidence.
        Western J Nurs Res. 1990; 12: 659-671
        • Jacobson S.F.
        Evaluating instruments for use in clinical nursing research.
        Instruments for clinical nursing research. Jones and Bartlett Publishers International, USA1997
        • Clark B.
        Development of the conscious sedation scale: establishing content validity and reliability.
        Gastroenterol Nurs. 1997; 20: 2-7
        • Hockenberry-Eaton M.
        • Mateuffel B.
        • Bottomley S.
        Development of two instruments examining stress and adjustment in children with cancer.
        J Ped Oncol Nurs. 1997; 14: 178-185
        • DeVellis R.F.
        Scale development: theory and applications.
        Sage Publications, Newbury Park1991
        • Hyland S.A.
        Assessing the oral cavity.
        Instruments for clinical nursing research. Jones and Bartlett Publishers International, USA1997
        • Casey A.
        • Glasper E.A.
        Development and use of the partnership model of nursing care.
        in: Glasper E.A. Tucker A. Advances in child health nursing. Scutari Press, London1993: 183-193
        • Allbright A.
        Oral care for the cancer chemotherapy patient.
        Nurs Times. 1984; 80: 40-42
        • Streiner D.L.
        • Normon G.R.
        Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use.
        2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford1995