Advertisement
Review| Volume 42, ISSUE 3, P282-289, February 2006

Efficacy of homeopathic therapy in cancer treatment

  • Stefania Milazzo
    Affiliations
    Department of Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Institute of Health and Social Care, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter EX2 4NT, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nancy Russell
    Affiliations
    Integrative Medicine Program Education, Unit 147, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030-0049, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Edzard Ernst
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Tel.: +44 1392 424839; fax: +44 1392 427562.
    Affiliations
    Department of Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Institute of Health and Social Care, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter EX2 4NT, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Many cancer patients use homeopathic approaches to increase their body’s ability to fight cancer, improve their physical and emotional well-being, and alleviate their pain resulting from the disease or conventional treatments. Homeopathy is highly controversial as there is no plausible mode of action for these highly diluted remedies. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically evaluate the efficacy of homeopathic remedies used as a sole or additional therapy in cancer care. We have searched the literature using the databases: Amed (from 1985); CINHAL (from 1982); EMBASE (from 1974); Medline (from 1951); and CAMbase (from 1998). Randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials including patients with cancer or past experience of cancer receiving single or combined homeopathic interventions were included. The methodological quality of the trials was assessed by Jadad score. Six studies met our inclusion criteria (five were randomised clinical trials and one was a non-randomised study); but the methodological quality was variable including some high standard studies. Our analysis of published literature on homeopathy found insufficient evidence to support clinical efficacy of homeopathic therapy in cancer care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. http://www.who.int/cancer/media/en/788.pdf [accessed 01.06.05].

        • Montfort H.
        A new homeopathic approach to neoplastic diseases: from cell destruction to carcinogen-induced apoptosis.
        Brit Homeopath J. 2000; 89: 78-83
        • Molassiotis
        • et al.
        Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey.
        Ann Oncol. 2005; 16: 655-663
        • Shang A.
        • Huwiler-Müntener K.
        • Nartey L.
        • et al.
        Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy.
        The Lancet. 2005; 366: 726-732
        • Jonas W.B.
        • Kaptchuk T.J.
        • Linde K.
        A critical overview of homeopathy.
        Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 393-399
        • Linde K.
        • Melchart D.
        Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of -the art review.
        J Altern Complem Med. 1998; 4: 371-388
        • Robinson K.
        Homeopathy: questions and answers.
        Elegance publishing, New Mexico1994
        • Bellavite P.
        • Signorini A.
        Homeopathy: a frontier in medical science.
        North Atlantic Books. 1995;
        • Ernst E.
        • Kaptchuk T.J.
        Homeopathy revisited.
        Arch Int Med. 1996; 156: 2162-2164
      2. https://www.cedrugstorenews.com/userapp/lessons/page_view_ui.cfm?lessonuid=&pageid=E44F4F4C5554FDD448D601472A02FFA0 [accessed 01.06.05].

      3. http://www.heel.com.au/homotoxicology/index.shtml [accessed 12.06.05].

        • Ernst E.
        • Schmidt K.
        Homotoxicology – a review of randomised clinical trials.
        Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004; 60 (Epub 2004 Jun 9): 299-306
      4. http://www.bioresourceinc.com/articles/vol1no2.html [accessed 12.06.05].

        • Reilly D.T.
        • Taylor M.A.
        • McSharry C.
        • et al.
        Is homoeopathy a placebo response? Controlled trial of homoeopathic potency, with pollen in hayfever as model.
        Lancet. 1986; 2: 881-886
        • Kulkarni A.
        • Nagarkar B.M.
        • Burde G.S.
        Radiation protection by use of homoeopathic medicines.
        Hahnemann Homoeopath Sand. 1988; 12: 20-23
        • Oberbaum M.
        Experimental treatment of chemotherapy-induced stomatitis using a homeopathic complex preparation: a preliminary study.
        Biol Med. 1998; 3: 104-108
        • Oberbaum M.
        • Yaniv I.
        • Ben-Gal Y.
        • et al.
        A randomized, controlled clinical trial of the homeopathic medication TRAUMEEL S in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced stomatitis in children undergoing stem cell transplantation.
        Cancer. 2001; 92: 684-690
        • Balzarini A.
        • Felisi E.
        • Martini A.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of homeopathic treatment of skin reactions during radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomised, double-blind clinical trial.
        Brit Homeopath J. 2000; 89: 8-12
        • Jacobs J.
        • Herman P.
        • Heron K.
        • et al.
        Homeopathy for menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.
        J Altern Complem Med. 2005; 11: 21-27
        • Thompson E.A.
        • Montgomery A.
        • Douglas D.
        • et al.
        A pilot, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of individualized homeopathy for symptoms of estrogen withdrawal in breast-cancer survivors.
        J Altern Complem Med. 2005; 11: 13-20
        • Vandenbroucke J.P.
        Homoeopathy and “the growth of truth”.
        The Lancet. 2005; 366: 691-692
        • Fisher P.
        The information medicine hypothesis.
        in: Shulte J. Endler P.C. Fundamental research in high dilutions. Kluwer, Dordrecht1998: xi-xiv
        • Witt C.
        • Ludtke R.
        • Weisshuhn T.E.
        • et al.
        High homeopathic potencies are different from potentized solvent when investigated with the REDEM technology.
        Forsch Komp Klass Nat. 2005; 12: 6-13
        • Masiello D.J.
        Melanoma.
        Am J Holistic Med. 2003–2004; 96: 318-320
        • Sato D.Y.
        • Wal R.
        • de Oliveira C.C.
        • et al.
        Histopathological and immunophenotyping studies on normal and sarcoma 180-bearing mice treated with a complex homeopathic medication.
        Homeopathy. 2005; 94: 26-32
        • Jadad A.
        • Moore A.
        • Carroll D.
        Assessing the quality of randomized trials: is blinding necessary?.
        Control Clin Trial. 1996; 17: 1-12